View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Karan69 Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:51 am Post subject: Jet Airways non-stop to HKG from BOM and DEL--A332s |
|
|
According to this thread on airliners.net about HKG aviation
http://www.airliners.net/discussions/general_aviation/read.main/3242654/1/
From reply no.10
Quote:
" can see as at Feb 6 the following has been booked with the schedule coordinator:
Jet Airways booking slots for BOM(JAI002/003) and DEL(JAI004/001), dailies with A332"
Sahara cancelled their slot booking
i think the flight numbers should be 9W though, but finally BOM recieves a much deserved non-stop HKG service---but i think they will have to wait till the ASA is ammended--but i think instead of DEL--which already as AI and CX non-stop they could have gone for BLR/MAA/CCU
Karan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nimish Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 9757 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
The flight numbers will be 9W, I think JAI refers to "Jet Airways India" - which is the operator applying for those slots!
9W should not have a problem filling the a/c on this route. CX will have to watch out now - most folks would prefer a non-stop rather than CX's current one-stop service via BKK. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VABBy Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 823 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah bt then the question is hw many of the pax who use CX actually are bound for HK. I guess quite a bit use the airline hub for connecting into other flights..
Is 9W planning to extend its A332 flights to HKG to some other destination. _________________ Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aseem Member
Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 2841 Location: YYZ
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
VABBy wrote: | Yeah bt then the question is hw many of the pax who use CX actually are bound for HK. I guess quite a bit use the airline hub for connecting into other flights..
Is 9W planning to extend its A332 flights to HKG to some other destination. |
makes sense. It would be anybody's guess that 9W is aiming for US west coast market. Who all are major carriers from west coast to HKG? And what is the status of negotions between GoI and HK admin regarding fifth freedom rights?
rgds
VT-ASJ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
COUGAR Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2007 Posts: 986 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
My vote is to extend the BOM-HKG ns to NRT and OSA: NRT can be 3x and OSA can be 4x.
The DEL-HKG can be OD. _________________ http://www.cougar-rides.com
<B>Live to Ride - Ride to Live</B>
-- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
himmat01 Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1392 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Does the current India-Hongkong bilateral agreement permit these additional flights?
At the moment India is allowed 5 flights per week (any aircraft) plus 1250 seats. _________________ Save Maharashtra! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
god knows how they reached to an agreement where CX is given 5th freedom rights to 2 destinations and but yet not one simple plain direct service between BOM and HKG |
|
Back to top |
|
|
xterra Member
Joined: 10 Feb 2007 Posts: 595 Location: DONT KNO
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:04 pm Post subject: cx files to bkk non stop na |
|
|
i flew cx to bkk once some yrs. back frm mumbai.. it was non stop flight departed at arnd 5 am in da moring |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D-ABTH Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 837 Location: VABB :: BOM
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BOM-HKG will really be popular... now only for them to nail the timing slots _________________ If it aint Boeing.. I aint going. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boeing7xx Member
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 477 Location: WSSS
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Why is Jet operating the 330 on the domestic sectors? I understand that their current infra of 3 X 343 + 2 X 332 is over capacity considering they only have 3 flights a day (2 from BOM and 1 from DEL to LHR). If this is the shape of things to come, I'd say its nice that we get wide bodies on domestic sectors. Its more economical to operate a 330 on a DEL-BOM with 80% load than a 320 with 100% load. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_380 Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its all about wide bodies on domestic sectors. 9W can fly more passengers in the peak hours and attract pax from airlines like S2, IT and IC. _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VABBy Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 823 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2007 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boeing7xx wrote: | Why is Jet operating the 330 on the domestic sectors? |
Are they ??? Thats news to me . Isnt the second A332 operating their superhit ATQ-LHR flights... more inputs required..
Secondly Dabth mate difficult to comment whether BOM-HKG will be hit till we hav load list of other airlines operating on this sector for atleast a quater.. Then i guess a bit of playing with those numbers to forsee wat wud be the loads like on the new flight.
Bt most imp to identify hw many of pax is actually HK bound Unless 9W takes its flight somewhere else beyond HK or codeshares with CX or some other airline. _________________ Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D-ABTH Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 837 Location: VABB :: BOM
|
Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2007 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
its not really difficult... AI has a vice grip on this sector now... CX's via-via flight goes filled to the max... a direct flight will definitely pull in 80% capacity im sure which would more than help the flight operate profitably.. _________________ If it aint Boeing.. I aint going. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|