View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Jaysit Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 4346
|
Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They're de facto dead at this point.
Mallya may as well pack up his bags, board his A319 and flee to some tinpot banana republic. I hear that Zimbabwe's taking applications. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ameya Member
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 3671 Location: Pune,Maharashtra
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
VJM might as well do a BLR Monaco on his A319 and settle there...
Employees, after not being paid for last 7 months are in for another shock, this time from the IT department which is sending them notices for TDS not being depsited.
This has come as a rude shock and indeed is a cruel joke |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nimish Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 9757 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
^^ This is indeed an irony and typical of Indian taxation laws. You're liable to pay the taxes even if you've not yet received the actual salary! Not sure how it's done in other parts of the world. _________________ We miss you Nalini! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ameya Member
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 3671 Location: Pune,Maharashtra
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
No this is something different.
Employee got salary with the slip which says x amount of TDS cut
Employee while filing returns fills it saying x amount TDS already taken and this is the remaining tax as the case may be
Then Income tax says, the x amount which you have claimed has been filed as TDS is not there with us so your filing is wrong.
Thats when employee realises that KF is only taking money from him and telling him its cut as TDS but not depositing it to the income tax office |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patkini Member
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 313 Location: BOM
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
I believe the IT dept is asking for dues for FY 11, which are essentially system generated notices sent out when there is a difference between Returns filed & the actual TDS collected.
The IT Dept officials seem to be stating in the ET article that they could be "lenient" on a case to case basis (though how they would decide these cases is a different story altogether). On an interim basis, I hope the emps are allowed to produce copies of their pay slips to get some leeway from the IT authorities & ensure the blame is squarely on the KF mgmt, though its pretty clear who the "real defaulter" is!
As per the attached doc on TDS norms, I quote the following paragraph where by the pay slips can help get some leeway, though would like to hear some CAs views on the same:
http://www.incometaxindia.gov.in/Archive/Tax_Deduction_at_source_18062012.pdf
Quote: | 5.6.1 Credit of TDS
If tax has been deducted at source u/s 192 to 194 A/B/BB/C/
D/E/EE/F/G/H/I/J/K, 195, 196A/B/C and D, the person from whose
income (payment) the tax has been deducted i.e. Payee or assessee
shall not be asked upon to pay the tax himself to the extent tax has
been deducted(Sec.205). Moreover u/s 199 such tax deducted at
source shall be treated as payment of tax on behalf of the payee
(assessee). |
Nimish referring to the attached link, I believe the IT dept should not ideally (though I might be wrong) make any TDS claims on salary not paid for FY 12 and FY 13:
http://www.financialexpress.com/news/tds-not-to-be-deducted-if-salary-is-only-credited-hc/165754/2
Quote: | The accrual of the payment and the actual act of making the payment must both exist in order that a deduction at source may be made. No deduction at source is contemplated under section 192 in cases where a payment towards salary has accrued but is not made |
Rgds,
Pats _________________ You will never Fly Alone! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation asks DGCA to examine implications of suspending Kingfisher
16-Oct-2012 10:35 AM
India's Ministry of Civil Aviation requested the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) examine the legal implications of cancelling or suspending Kingfisher Airlines’ operating licence (livemint.com, 15-Oct-2012). Indian authorities are reportedly waiting until the carrier has replied to the DGCA’s show-cause notice before deciding on what action to take in relation to the airline. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kingfisher's Airbus A319, VT-KFH which had been stored at DEL has been returned to her lessor, and ferried to SAW today. _________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iah87 Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 2567
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sri_bom wrote: | Indian Ministry of Civil Aviation asks DGCA to examine implications of suspending Kingfisher
16-Oct-2012 10:35 AM
India's Ministry of Civil Aviation requested the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) examine the legal implications of cancelling or suspending Kingfisher Airlines’ operating licence (livemint.com, 15-Oct-2012). Indian authorities are reportedly waiting until the carrier has replied to the DGCA’s show-cause notice before deciding on what action to take in relation to the airline. |
What implications can there be ? Not much in traffic, KFs demise will not have any further impact. The only thing is to sort out the employees' salaries. Delaying this only hurts the employees more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
desiguy2447 Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After finding this article on Gulf News online today.
I wonder if Kingfisher is working out something with Eithad. After Jet airways and Eithad couldn't agree on the value of Jet airways last week.
http://gulfnews.com/business/aviation/etihad-not-interested-in-majority-ownership-ceo-says-1.1090176
"All the Indian carriers have approached us and we continue to evaluate the impact of FDI [Foreign Direct Investment],” Hogan told reporters Tuesday on the sidelines of a conference in Abu Dhabi." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ameya Member
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 3671 Location: Pune,Maharashtra
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Read some reports this morning saying that KF CEO had gone to meet AAI director to request AAI to release an A320 which is in MAA and being repossessed by the lessor.
AAI boss has informed him that they need to deposit 15Cr immediately to let the bird go and have a bank guarentee before flying again |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nimish Member
Joined: 16 Dec 2006 Posts: 9757 Location: Bangalore, India
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
^^ Good to hear that AAI is taking it's dues seriously _________________ We miss you Nalini! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The_Goat Member
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 3260 Location: South of France
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
desiguy2447 wrote: | After finding this article on Gulf News online today.
I wonder if Kingfisher is working out something with Eithad.
|
If that is true Etihad must have been smoking some really good stuff!
The only thing any investor would want to do with KF is to not touch it with a bargepole. _________________ I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I wonder who believes KF can get back to flying and profits.....be realistic folks ........VJM needs to close down and restart at a later date if possible. _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d3vski Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 440 Location: In the First Class lounge.....
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HAWK21M wrote: | I wonder who believes KF can get back to flying and profits.....be realistic folks ........VJM needs to close down and restart at a later date if possible. |
For a so called shrewd businessman, i am really confused as to why he has not taken this approach.
I am assuming Kingfisher is a standalone company within the UB group and surely it can be cast adrift with some sort of deal to sell the brand to another division and start again in a few months/years. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ameya Member
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 3671 Location: Pune,Maharashtra
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
d3vski wrote: | HAWK21M wrote: | I wonder who believes KF can get back to flying and profits.....be realistic folks ........VJM needs to close down and restart at a later date if possible. |
For a so called shrewd businessman, i am really confused as to why he has not taken this approach.
I am assuming Kingfisher is a standalone company within the UB group and surely it can be cast adrift with some sort of deal to sell the brand to another division and start again in a few months/years. |
A lot of his personal money and property is involved along with the UB group, which eventually the banks would lay hands on if the companies goes bust and hence he is fighting the closure.
The moment he gets all those properties out of clutches of banks, he would be least bothered about the airline.
Wonder if he remembers it was a birthday gift ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
d3vski Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 440 Location: In the First Class lounge.....
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ameya wrote: | d3vski wrote: | HAWK21M wrote: | I wonder who believes KF can get back to flying and profits.....be realistic folks ........VJM needs to close down and restart at a later date if possible. |
For a so called shrewd businessman, i am really confused as to why he has not taken this approach.
I am assuming Kingfisher is a standalone company within the UB group and surely it can be cast adrift with some sort of deal to sell the brand to another division and start again in a few months/years. |
A lot of his personal money and property is involved along with the UB group, which eventually the banks would lay hands on if the companies goes bust and hence he is fighting the closure.
The moment he gets all those properties out of clutches of banks, he would be least bothered about the airline.
Wonder if he remembers it was a birthday gift ! |
He is a twat for putting up his own personal miney as guarantees.
First rule of business is to keep your personal fortune and assets separate from your business deals in case it all goes down the pan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
The_Goat Member
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 Posts: 3260 Location: South of France
|
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
d3vski wrote: |
He is a twat for putting up his own personal miney as guarantees.
First rule of business is to keep your personal fortune and assets separate from your business deals in case it all goes down the pan. |
The reason why Vijay Mallya could start an airline while most of us cannot is because he has assets which can be guaranteed. Banks, money lenders and other investors aren't stupid. They wouldn't lend money without guarantee in some form. The only way VM could raise money for his airline experiment is because of his huge liquor empire, at least some of which he would have had to pledge to his lenders. _________________ I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iah87 Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 2567
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indian Civil Aviation Minister confirms Kingfisher Airlines still faces loss of licence
18-Oct-2012 12:34 PM
India's Civil Aviation Minister Ajit Singh confirmed Kingfisher Airlines' operating licence could be revoked unless the carrier can display it can viably resume operations, pay employee salaries and settle other dues (CNBC-TV18, 17-Oct-2012). The Indian Directorate General of Civil Aviation has failed to approve the carrier’s schedule for winter 2012. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kingfisher Airlines winter schedule not approved by Indian DGCA
18-Oct-2012 12:28 PM
India's Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) confirmed Kingfisher Airlines’ schedule for winter 2012/2013 has not been approved (IANS, 17-Oct-2012). The carrier has yet to respond to a DGCA show-cause notice as to why it should not have its operating licence revoked. The carrier has until 20-Oct-2012 to respond. Overall, the DGCA reported Indian airlines will operate 19% less flights in winter 2012 than in the previous period. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stretching to reach the shore.............but the shore has moved further away........VJM WAKE UP. _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luvleen Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2012 Posts: 179 Location: Bombay
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/transportation/airlines-/-aviation/kingfisher-airlines-license-suspension-is-imminent-dgca-sources/articleshow/16879626.cms |
in the same article IT has blamed the industrial unrest for flight cancellations. How convenient it is that they haven't mentioned the reason WHY there's an unrest in the first place |
|
Back to top |
|
|
abhijith16 Member
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 1575 Location: DOH/IXE/MEL
|
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HT shows KINGFISHER LICENSE SUSPENDED!
RIP Kingfisher Airlines (12 May 2005-20 October 2012) _________________ <a><img></a> |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luvleen Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2012 Posts: 179 Location: Bombay
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mallya's private plane will continue to fly
The airline's licence may have been suspended, but Kingfisher promoter Vijay Mallya will still continue to globetrot in his personal Airbus Corporate Jet (ACJ) which is registered after his name as VT-VJM. He had two flying licences, a schedule operator permit for Kingfisher Airlines, which is now suspended, and a non schedule operator permit under which his super luxury 22-seater Airbus A-319 ACJ flies.
Since the latter is still valid, Mallya is unlikely to be seen in commercial flights of rival airlines. A senior airline commander said a set of six pilots and about four airhostesses is maintained for the ACJ.
While Kingfisher pilots and other employees have not been paid since March, the personnel for Mallya's personal plane are learnt to have been paid regularly or at least the $-250 daily allowance they get when abroad with the chairman. "Recently some other airline pilots had a fight with the exclusive group which flies VT-VJM over why are they flying when their colleagues aren't? The latter replied that even if the airline is shut down, they will have their job as the personal aircraft would still be needed for UB Group top brass and the chairman," said a pilot.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Kingfisher-Airlines-debacle-Mallya-abroad-son-hunts-for-calendar-girls-employees-in-lurch/articleshow/16897940.cms _________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ameya Member
Joined: 09 May 2007 Posts: 3671 Location: Pune,Maharashtra
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Apparently, the owner is still in talks with 2 entitites, both airlines and they are working out a deal.
It would be more like a 49% stake + management control and repaying over 70% debt in return |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ameya wrote: | Apparently, the owner is still in talks with 2 entitites, both airlines and they are working out a deal.
It would be more like a 49% stake + management control and repaying over 70% debt in return |
Wouldn't a fresh investment by an investor be more sensible economically. _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
"One aircraft has already been shifted to a grass field at Chennai airport. We have locked the hangars and will not allow KFA to take away anything from the hangars. Two more hangars are with the airline and after a while we will vacate them too so that they can be rented out to others. The aircraft won't be allowed to be repossessed by lessors unless we get about Rs 15 crore per plane," said a senior official of AAI, whom KFA owes close to Rs 300 crore.
Sources hinted that legal options are being studied to examine if airline promoter Vijay Mallya's personal aircraft, an Airbus A-319 corporate jet, could be seized too when it lands at an Indian airport.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Airports-Authority-of-India-wont-let-lessors-take-Kingfisher-Airlines-planes/articleshow/16909039.cms _________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11366 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/business/over-15-kingfisher-airlines-planes-not-fit-to-fly-sources_772019.html
Over 15 Kingfisher Airlines planes not fit to fly: Sources
Oct 22, 2012
In fresh trouble for cash strapped Kingfisher Airlines, at least 15 planes leased to them have been stripped clean, the leasing company sources told CNN-IBN. The 15 aircraft have been stripped of crucial parts at various airports and have been declared not fit to fly.
Sources said that inspection of two aircraft in New Delhi found the passenger and cockpit interiors cleaned out. Airport authorities refused to take away aircraft till all dues are paid. Just seven Kingfisher aircraft are currently fit to fly. _________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
desiguy2447 Member
Joined: 23 Feb 2007 Posts: 37
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VM has something going on with Kingfisher for which I suspect as stated the two airlines in talks with Kingfisher will get 49% and management control of the company.
I also have a feeling the Government of India would not allow Kingfisher to go under as to the amount of unemployed people that would be with out a job.
Once all this is sorted out the License will be given back, and Kingfisher will fly again this time with people who know how to run an airline! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
con spirito Member
Joined: 07 Apr 2007 Posts: 577 Location: Inflight
|
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
desiguy2447 wrote: | VM has something going on with Kingfisher for which I suspect as stated the two airlines in talks with Kingfisher will get 49% and management control of the company.
I also have a feeling the Government of India would not allow Kingfisher to go under as to the amount of unemployed people that would be with out a job.
Once all this is sorted out the License will be given back, and Kingfisher will fly again this time with people who know how to run an airline! |
I just hope your wish comes true! _________________ India is one of the richest countries in the world.
The only problem is........all the wealth is distributed in the wrong hands. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aseem Member
Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 2841 Location: YYZ
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Was listening to CNN-IBN discussion on the state of KF. They quote that even the leased planes have been salvaged. You are not supposed to have your leased car fixed by roadside mechanic, how were they allowed to salvage a leased plane.
rgds
VT-ASJ _________________ [url=http://openflights.org/user/aseemsjohri]
[/url] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jaysit Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 4346
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
desiguy2447 wrote: | VM has something going on with Kingfisher for which I suspect as stated the two airlines in talks with Kingfisher will get 49% and management control of the company.
I also have a feeling the Government of India would not allow Kingfisher to go under as to the amount of unemployed people that would be with out a job.
Once all this is sorted out the License will be given back, and Kingfisher will fly again this time with people who know how to run an airline! |
In a nation with a 10% unemployment rate, a few thousand unemployed by IT's shenanigans is a drop in the bucket. The Center has better ways to waste its money than propping up IT. After all, they have the ginormous suckubus that is AI to keep feeding. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jaysit Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 4346
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iah87 Member
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 2567
|
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_striking-employees-reject-kingfisher-3-month-salary-formula_1755449
Why are they bickering about salaries when the airline will most likely never fly again. The employees and the management are perhaps blissfully unaware that the license has been suspended, many of the aircraft are under impoundment with AAI (only 7 are supposed to be operational) and even if it takes off, how many would book this airline.
Also I saw the news reports that there are 4000+ employees - this many for an airline with just 7 aircraft ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|