View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Aiel Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 927 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 6:58 pm Post subject: Press Release:Kingfisher Deploys Autoland System. |
|
|
<i><b>Kingfisher Airlines Deploys Autoland System to Deal with Fog
Becomes the first private airline in India to receive certification to execute precision landings in poor visibility in category IIIA Operations</b>
Kingfisher Airlines has created a new milestone in Indian Civil Aviation by becoming the first private airline in India to receive certification to operate its flights in poor visibility using sophisticated Autoland Systems in the highest category of operation-Category IIIA. This development marks a significant step forward and is another effort in Kingfisher Airlines’ continuous commitment to on-time performance.</i>
http://www.businesswireindia.com/PressRelease.asp?b2mid=11574 _________________ My Flickr photos
My JP.net account |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VABBy Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 823 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Highest catagory 3A since wen?? I think 3C is highest in the world while DEL has 3B which i guess IC is using isnt it?? Open to corrections here _________________ Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Sorce is Interesting too.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Aiel Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 927 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
grade A > grade C, according to laypersons.
that must be the reason they're hyping it up so much. _________________ My Flickr photos
My JP.net account |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_380 Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Fri Dec 22, 2006 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
VABBy wrote: | Highest catagory 3A since wen?? I think 3C is highest in the world while DEL has 3B which i guess IC is using isnt it?? Open to corrections here |
3B is the highest... If im not wrong...
DEL is optimised for 3B although but systems are not to updated unlike other airports... _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKLDELNonstop Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
A comes before B therefore A must be higher. Oh man didnt you guys know that. Elementary alphabets  _________________ Geniuses are always misunderstood in their lifetimes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
VABBy Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 823 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 8:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the_380 wrote: |
3B is the highest... If im not wrong...
DEL is optimised for 3B although but systems are not to updated unlike other airports... |
3C is the latest version mate while 3B is operational when RVR is 200m but not less than 50m
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrument_Landing_System _________________ Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cat IIIC is the highest .
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_380 Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
HAWK21M wrote: | Cat IIIC is the highest .
regds
MEL |
Oh thanks Mel and VABBy... was unaware  _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 7:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Instrument aided landings are defined in categories by the ICAO. These are dependent upon the required visibility level and the degree to which the landing can be conducted automatically without input by the pilot.
CAT I - This category permits pilots to land with a decision height (where the pilot takes over from the autopilot) of 200 ft and a forward visibility of 2400 ft. Simplex autopilots are sufficient.
CAT II - This category permits pilots to land with a decision height of 100 ft and a forward visibility of 1200 ft. Autopilots have a fail passive requirement.
CAT IIIa - Total Instrument capability on autopilot. Pilot assumes control on touch down. The failure rate of the automatic system must be better than 1 in 10 million.
CAT IIIb - As IIIa but with the addition of automatic roll out after touchdown incorporated with the pilot taking control some distance along the runway. Some form of runway guidance system is needed.
CAT IIIc - As IIIb but with the inclusion of automatic taxi control enabling runway to terminal without pilot intervention. No current aircraft has this capability.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
AKLDELNonstop Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 1066 Location: Auckland
|
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats really helpful MEL thanks. But will the 380 or 787 be IIIC enabled?
I think that will be harder to due to moving objects(incl other ac) on the Tarmac, and probably undesirable as well. You would probably want the pilot to control the a/c at that stage
Cheers _________________ Geniuses are always misunderstood in their lifetimes. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Def the modern Aircraft would be Cat IIIC Enabled.
The problem is After landing to taxi to the bay there would be need for TAWS.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
the_380 Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the details Mel _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!!  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boeing7xx Member
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 477 Location: WSSS
|
Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HAWK21M wrote: | Def the modern Aircraft would be Cat IIIC Enabled.
The problem is After landing to taxi to the bay there would be need for TAWS.
regds
MEL |
"FOLLOW ME" Zindabad!!!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
With zero visability even the Follow me Jeep would struggle.A person 6 ft away is difficult to notice.Using a flashlight makes things worse.
Its like standing in room of smoke.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
karatecatman Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 3:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
How about the use of infrared sensors like in night vision used by the armed forces?
Has that technology transfeered to civil aviation? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boeing7xx Member
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 477 Location: WSSS
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A "Follow Me" for the "Follow Me" ... form a chain Just kidding, but in practical situations I can tell you that visibility is never zero in Delhi. It approaches some really low limits, but never in my 12years did i ever see ZERO visibility.
Bad weather epitome, Guwahati, Bagdogra, Aizwal, Shillong, Leh, Srinagar and sada-AMBARSAR |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I remember a night in the late 90s.When We could see Fog approaching & in minutes it was all over.A person 6 ft away was difficult to trace,not to add driving with out headlights as Bright lights were complicating things.
From the hotel room on the 6th floor.
We could see a cloud cover at the 3rd floor level.It was weird.Pollution adds to Fog.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Boeing7xx Member
Joined: 23 Dec 2006 Posts: 477 Location: WSSS
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Are your 757's equipped for CAT-IIIB? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
HAWK21M Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Boeing7xx wrote: | Are your 757's equipped for CAT-IIIB? |
Yes.Unfortunately the Aircraft is new hence only Foreign crew are CatIII certified, as Indian Crew require requisite Hrs on type & DGCA Regulations do not permit all Foreign crew ops.
So next year upgradation to Cat II & then 2008 Cat III.Currently CatI with rvr 650 minimum as Co SOP.
So now spotting time for BOM Spotters at Terminal 1C
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stealthpilot Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2325 Location: BLR, DXB
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HAWK21M wrote: | In
CAT I - This category permits pilots to land with a decision height (where the pilot takes over from the autopilot) of 200 ft and a forward visibility of 2400 ft. Simplex autopilots are sufficient.
CAT II - This category permits pilots to land with a decision height of 100 ft and a forward visibility of 1200 ft. Autopilots have a fail passive requirement.
CAT IIIa - Total Instrument capability on autopilot. Pilot assumes control on touch down. The failure rate of the automatic system must be better than 1 in 10 million.
CAT IIIb - As IIIa but with the addition of automatic roll out after touchdown incorporated with the pilot taking control some distance along the runway. Some form of runway guidance system is needed.
CAT IIIc - As IIIb but with the inclusion of automatic taxi control enabling runway to terminal without pilot intervention. No current aircraft has this capability. |
I'm pretty sure that's not right. I know CAT 3a and 3b do have a Decision Height and a Runway Visual Range.
CAT 1 = 200 DH and 2400 RVR (1800 with TDZE and CTL)
CAT 2 = 100 DH and 1200 RVR
CAT 3a (?) = <100 DH and 700 RVR
CAT 3b (?) = <50 DH and between 700 and 150 RVR
CAT 3c = 0 DH and 0 RVR = complete auto land
The problem with ANY ILS is that once you land, you cant really taxi safely. I don't beleive there's any system which lets the aircraft taxi automatically, the pilot does it all, and if he cant see he doesnt taxi  _________________ eP007 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stealthpilot Member

Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2325 Location: BLR, DXB
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AKLDELNonstop wrote: | Thats really helpful MEL thanks. But will the 380 or 787 be IIIC enabled? |
Many aircrafts now come CAT 3c ready, I dont have any sources but im pretty sure 737 and airbuses 'can' do them (it's probably an extra option)
The problem is that once they land they cant taxi anywhere, so it's probably used as a backup in an emergency if the aircraft has to get on the ground. _________________ eP007 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|