View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:04 pm Post subject: Etihad Airbus 340-500 |
|
|
hey i had gone out of india last week and returned on 31 jan was travelling on etihad airways
on my AUH - BOM it was an A340-500 the take off was the smoothest i ever encountered of years of travelling smooth i mean with ease and panache . when it landed in mumbai it used the entire runway i mean ENTIRE and yes it touched down at the right spot but yet .... and had to take a 180 deg turn can any body explain how come this happend |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
depends on which runway you landed on...there were some taxiway closures in BOM...esp for R09...even i had to backtrack once...and mine is a B738 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
C-GHKR Member
Joined: 26 Dec 2006 Posts: 626 Location: yyz
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well i landed on the regular runway ... the same on ive been landing for years lol and after that an IT flight landed taking which didnt use the runway completely |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
okies..but in which direction??? regular runway is 09/27
so which one did you land on??? better still..did u app from Juhu end or the Jarimari / Mahim creek end??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
from mahim creek side technically approached from 27 the other end has 09 wriiten on it it touched down correctly and ran till the grey oval on the other end if you c on google earth the place where it is written 09 there is a turn to the rt but our a/c went beyond that and had to take a 180 deg turn |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_380 Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Definately must be 09-27 ... i doubt A345s can land in the other rwy. _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you land on Rnwy 14.
regds
MEL _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nope on runway 27 ...approached from 27 started our descend from navi mumbai side mahim and touched on rwy 27 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: Why A340-500 to BOM |
|
|
Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
I know we are talking Etihad here and so fuel-efficiency is NOT a concern!
But does anyone know why they use a 340-500? DO they further connect to EUR/US? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
selecta Member
Joined: 24 Dec 2006 Posts: 813 Location: ORD
|
Posted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whats with the 2 Xs on runway 14.
1 on the displaced threshold and the 2nd one past the 1000 ft. point?
link _________________
http://openflights.org/user/citrus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karan69 Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:19 am Post subject: Re: Why A340-500 to BOM |
|
|
ssbmat wrote: | Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
? |
EY has been operating the A345 for the last 2 months now to BOM along with the 2x weekly 767-300ER, have spotted the 345 on 3 occasions myself, However once the SYD flights start the 345 will shift to the 777-300ER--check their schedules from March 24-25th onwards
So expect to see or fly the A345 in the morning departure atleast till mid-March
Karan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
the_380 Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 2329 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Karan69 wrote: | However once the SYD flights start the 345 will shift to the 777-300ER--check their schedules from March 24-25th onwards
So expect to see or fly the A345 in the morning departure atleast till mid-March |
That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right? _________________ http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karan69 Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the_380 wrote: | That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right? |
Not quite--Jet Airways----VS------SAA----AF[they keep changing their aircrafts altough now they operate the 77W]
Karan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ssbmat wrote:
Quote: | Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
I know we are talking Etihad here and so fuel-efficiency Laughing is NOT a concern!
But does anyone know why they use a 340-500? DO they further connect to EUR/US? |
well their A345 operate to jfk and arrive from JFK at 2030 hrs or something and dep time is 1415 hrs so they chose mumbai to use those
aircrafts during the free time ... that is dpeloy them to mumbai at 0300 hrs
and comeback at 1045 hrs and then do the jfk run .
they operate them to DEL pretty frequently as well
they stared operating the A345 from winter '06 till march 23 '07 then
going for a daily B777-300
Quote: | That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right? |
9W : A340-300
SA : A340-200
GF : A340-300 (OCCASIONALLY)
VS : A340-300
MK : A340-300
KU : A340-300 (OCCASIONALLY)
AY : A340-300 (JUNE ONWARDS)
EY : A340-500 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:55 am Post subject: Ethiad Expansion |
|
|
Etihad Airways announced plans to triple capacity to India in the next 18 months, subject to government approval, including new services to Southern India and the introduction of a second daily service to Mumbai and increase in Delhi frequency from three times weekly to daily (Hindu Business Line, 22-Feb-07).
Etihad Airways: "[We want to] at least triple the number of services we fly to and from India in the course of the next 12 to 18 months. Initially, our focus will be on the South. We'd like to add two destinations this year, if we get permission. (It will be two out of) Kochi, Bangalore, Chennai, Thiruvananthapuram and Hyderabad", Charles Phelps-Penry, Regional General Manager, Asia Pacific. Source: Hindu Business Line, 22-Feb-07.
Sri_Bom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300
Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prajay Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 217 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
avbuff wrote: | EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300
Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600 |
Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?
Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.
Prajay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?
Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.
|
well it is all about a/c scheduling otherwise who would send a A345/6 on a 3hr run .EY currently operates an A340-500 to BOM as well
and btw EY A330-200 has a capacity of 225 pax
EY A340-500 has a capacity of 240 pax
and its A340-600 may have a capacity of 260 (QR A346 has a capacity of 266)
so basically these a/c boast of range capacity wise there is not much difference .. so filling the planes wont be difficult |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Prajay Member
Joined: 11 Feb 2007 Posts: 217 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
avbuff wrote: | Quote: | Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?
Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.
|
well it is all about a/c scheduling otherwise who would send a A345/6 on a 3hr run .EY currently operates an A340-500 to BOM as well
and btw EY A330-200 has a capacity of 225 pax
EY A340-500 has a capacity of 240 pax
and its A340-600 may have a capacity of 260 (QR A346 has a capacity of 266)
so basically these a/c boast of range capacity wise there is not much difference .. so filling the planes wont be difficult |
True also considering DEL-AUH is x3 they would fill the plane up.
260 on a A346!!! That must be comfortable however, wouldnt it be more economical to fill the a/c wid 300 odd seats.
Prajay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
well as i told u A340-500/600 is all about range now since we kn ow these a/c are going to be used on ultra long haul sectors they cannot afford to cram in more seats
i travelled in the EY A 340-500 very comfortable Y class seats when compared to A330-200 and technically for economy class other than the legroom nothing is different
Besides A345/6 also milk out money from the premium class pax flat beds suites etc etc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Karan69 Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 1334
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
avbuff wrote: | EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300 |
Are you sure their schedules show a daily 77W, thus eliminating F class
Karan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
avbuff Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 5031
|
Posted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ya 100% check the schedules on the website now they show A340-300
they have switched i t with the KUL route a/c KUL will now be serve4d by B77W which is currently being served by the A340-300 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justbala Member
Joined: 11 Jan 2007 Posts: 1898 Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Prajay wrote: | avbuff wrote: | EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300
Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600 |
Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?
Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.
Prajay |
The other day I was surprised to find UL operating an A343 on the CMB-TRV sector, which has a travel time of barely 1 hr!! Earlier, when EK did not operate directly to TRV, most pax used to transit via CMB (since EK owns most of UL).. but now with direct flights between DXB and TRV, wonder if UL still manages to find pax to fill in the flight. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
VABBy Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 823 Location: DEL
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
avbuff wrote: | Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600 |
Actually EY provides good connections to JNB & CAI plus certain european cities so them seem to be doing fine. _________________ Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Etihad Airways confirmed it is considering launching services to Bangalore, Chennai and Hyderabdad and is targeting improving Indian load factors by 8% over the next eight months, following adjustments to its timetable (Gulf News, 10-Apr-07).
Etihad Airways: "India is the cornerstone market for Etihad. Both it and the UAE are growing into positions as world-class holiday and business destinations. As the second-fasted growing economy in world, India will demand frequent travel to the Middle East and this will continue for the foreseeable future." Iain Burns, VP Communications, Gulf News, 10-Apr-07. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|