Airliners-India.com Forum Index Airliners-India.com
Flickr Group & Facebook
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Etihad Airbus 340-500

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Civil Aviation
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:04 pm    Post subject: Etihad Airbus 340-500 Reply with quote

hey i had gone out of india last week and returned on 31 jan was travelling on etihad airways

on my AUH - BOM it was an A340-500 the take off was the smoothest i ever encountered of years of travelling smooth i mean with ease and panache . when it landed in mumbai it used the entire runway i mean ENTIRE and yes it touched down at the right spot but yet .... and had to take a 180 deg turn can any body explain how come this happend
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
iflytb20
Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 1079
Location: Next to the Airport

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

depends on which runway you landed on...there were some taxiway closures in BOM...esp for R09...even i had to backtrack once...and mine is a B738
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
C-GHKR
Member


Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Posts: 626
Location: yyz

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually I've never seen a smoother take-off than this.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/0312682/L/

I think you mean smooth = low pitch angle, but it not always an advantage.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

well i landed on the regular runway ... the same on ive been landing for years lol and after that an IT flight landed taking which didnt use the runway completely
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
iflytb20
Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 1079
Location: Next to the Airport

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 8:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

okies..but in which direction??? regular runway is 09/27
so which one did you land on??? better still..did u app from Juhu end or the Jarimari / Mahim creek end???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

from mahim creek side technically approached from 27 the other end has 09 wriiten on it it touched down correctly and ran till the grey oval on the other end if you c on google earth the place where it is written 09 there is a turn to the rt but our a/c went beyond that and had to take a 180 deg turn
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
the_380
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2329
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 10:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Definately must be 09-27 ... i doubt A345s can land in the other rwy.
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 8132
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 1:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Did you land on Rnwy 14.
regds
MEL
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

nope on runway 27 ...approached from 27 started our descend from navi mumbai side mahim and touched on rwy 27
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
ssbmat
Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 1710

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:37 pm    Post subject: Why A340-500 to BOM Reply with quote

Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
I know we are talking Etihad here and so fuel-efficiency Laughing is NOT a concern!
But does anyone know why they use a 340-500? DO they further connect to EUR/US?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
selecta
Member


Joined: 24 Dec 2006
Posts: 813
Location: ORD

PostPosted: Sun Feb 11, 2007 10:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Whats with the 2 Xs on runway 14.

1 on the displaced threshold and the 2nd one past the 1000 ft. point?

link
_________________

http://openflights.org/user/citrus
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Karan69
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1334

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 1:19 am    Post subject: Re: Why A340-500 to BOM Reply with quote

ssbmat wrote:
Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
?


EY has been operating the A345 for the last 2 months now to BOM along with the 2x weekly 767-300ER, have spotted the 345 on 3 occasions myself, However once the SYD flights start the 345 will shift to the 777-300ER--check their schedules from March 24-25th onwards

So expect to see or fly the A345 in the morning departure atleast till mid-March

Karan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
the_380
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2329
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 6:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Karan69 wrote:
However once the SYD flights start the 345 will shift to the 777-300ER--check their schedules from March 24-25th onwards

So expect to see or fly the A345 in the morning departure atleast till mid-March

That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right?
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Karan69
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1334

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_380 wrote:
That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right?


Not quite--Jet Airways----VS------SAA----AF[they keep changing their aircrafts altough now they operate the 77W]

Karan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Mon Feb 12, 2007 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ssbmat wrote:

Quote:
Maybe it has to do with aircraft scheduling and all that, but isnt A340-500 a sort of "misfit" on a 2.5 hr run?
Maybe the A332 would be a better choice-?
I know we are talking Etihad here and so fuel-efficiency Laughing is NOT a concern!
But does anyone know why they use a 340-500? DO they further connect to EUR/US?


well their A345 operate to jfk and arrive from JFK at 2030 hrs or something and dep time is 1415 hrs so they chose mumbai to use those
aircrafts during the free time ... that is dpeloy them to mumbai at 0300 hrs
and comeback at 1045 hrs and then do the jfk run .

they operate them to DEL pretty frequently as well

they stared operating the A345 from winter '06 till march 23 '07 then
going for a daily B777-300




Quote:
That means we'll just have one A340 operator to BOM left that VS right?



9W : A340-300
SA : A340-200
GF : A340-300 (OCCASIONALLY)
VS : A340-300
MK : A340-300
KU : A340-300 (OCCASIONALLY)
AY : A340-300 (JUNE ONWARDS)
EY : A340-500
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
sri_bom
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 2365
Location: Singapore

PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 7:55 am    Post subject: Ethiad Expansion Reply with quote

Etihad Airways announced plans to triple capacity to India in the next 18 months, subject to government approval, including new services to Southern India and the introduction of a second daily service to Mumbai and increase in Delhi frequency from three times weekly to daily (Hindu Business Line, 22-Feb-07).

Etihad Airways: "[We want to] at least triple the number of services we fly to and from India in the course of the next 12 to 18 months. Initially, our focus will be on the South. We'd like to add two destinations this year, if we get permission. (It will be two out of) Kochi, Bangalore, Chennai, Thiruvananthapuram and Hyderabad", Charles Phelps-Penry, Regional General Manager, Asia Pacific. Source: Hindu Business Line, 22-Feb-07.

Sri_Bom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Fri Feb 23, 2007 9:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300

Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Prajay
Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

avbuff wrote:
EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300

Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600


Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?

Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.

Very Happy Prajay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?

Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.



well it is all about a/c scheduling otherwise who would send a A345/6 on a 3hr run .EY currently operates an A340-500 to BOM as well



and btw EY A330-200 has a capacity of 225 pax
EY A340-500 has a capacity of 240 pax
and its A340-600 may have a capacity of 260 (QR A346 has a capacity of 266)

so basically these a/c boast of range capacity wise there is not much difference .. so filling the planes wont be difficult
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Prajay
Member


Joined: 11 Feb 2007
Posts: 217
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

avbuff wrote:
Quote:
Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?

Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.



well it is all about a/c scheduling otherwise who would send a A345/6 on a 3hr run .EY currently operates an A340-500 to BOM as well



and btw EY A330-200 has a capacity of 225 pax
EY A340-500 has a capacity of 240 pax
and its A340-600 may have a capacity of 260 (QR A346 has a capacity of 266)

so basically these a/c boast of range capacity wise there is not much difference .. so filling the planes wont be difficult


True also considering DEL-AUH is x3 they would fill the plane up.

260 on a A346!!! That must be comfortable however, wouldnt it be more economical to fill the a/c wid 300 odd seats.

Very Happy Prajay
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

well as i told u A340-500/600 is all about range now since we kn ow these a/c are going to be used on ultra long haul sectors they cannot afford to cram in more seats

i travelled in the EY A 340-500 very comfortable Y class seats when compared to A330-200 and technically for economy class other than the legroom nothing is different


Besides A345/6 also milk out money from the premium class pax flat beds suites etc etc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Karan69
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1334

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

avbuff wrote:
EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300


Are you sure their schedules show a daily 77W, thus eliminating F class

Karan
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
avbuff
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 5031

PostPosted: Sat Feb 24, 2007 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ya 100% check the schedules on the website now they show A340-300

they have switched i t with the KUL route a/c KUL will now be serve4d by B77W which is currently being served by the A340-300
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
justbala
Member


Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 1898
Location: Bangalore

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Prajay wrote:
avbuff wrote:
EY is now going to change the a/c for mumbai from A340-500/B767-300 to
a daily A340-300

Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600


Do they have that much load from DEL to AUH to fill an A346?

Like most people prefer DXB although AUH is growing.

Very Happy Prajay


The other day I was surprised to find UL operating an A343 on the CMB-TRV sector, which has a travel time of barely 1 hr!! Earlier, when EK did not operate directly to TRV, most pax used to transit via CMB (since EK owns most of UL).. but now with direct flights between DXB and TRV, wonder if UL still manages to find pax to fill in the flight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
VABBy
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 823
Location: DEL

PostPosted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

avbuff wrote:
Schedules to DEL show tri weekly services 2 X A330-200 and 1 X A340-500 and from aug onwards A340-500 will step up to A340-600


Actually EY provides good connections to JNB & CAI plus certain european cities so them seem to be doing fine.
_________________
Expeditors- You'd be surprised how far we will go for you www.expeditors.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
sri_bom
Member


Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 2365
Location: Singapore

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 11:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Etihad Airways confirmed it is considering launching services to Bangalore, Chennai and Hyderabdad and is targeting improving Indian load factors by 8% over the next eight months, following adjustments to its timetable (Gulf News, 10-Apr-07).

Etihad Airways: "India is the cornerstone market for Etihad. Both it and the UAE are growing into positions as world-class holiday and business destinations. As the second-fasted growing economy in world, India will demand frequent travel to the Middle East and this will continue for the foreseeable future." Iain Burns, VP Communications, Gulf News, 10-Apr-07.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Civil Aviation All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com