Airliners-India.com Forum Index Airliners-India.com
Flickr Group & Facebook
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Air India Emergency Landing Blocks IGI main Runway
Goto page Previous  1, 2
 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Civil Aviation
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
victor2alpha
Member


Joined: 08 Apr 2007
Posts: 120

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love how journalism treats aviation! I remember some press article where the recent crash of the 734 in Indonesia was put as the crash of the 747! Phew!! Do they even know.. Rolling Eyes
_________________
victor2alpha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ssbmat
Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 1710

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think some sort of Public Interest Litigation MUST be filed to assess the qualification of Journalists/media to report Aviation matters. These smart-ass TV journos report whatever comes to mind without even checking for facts. I feel that Air India should sue them blind.
This on-field reporter had the temerity to suggest that Airbus Industrie does not supply any spares for A310, simply because it is currently not in production!!
Or Vishnu Som, who suggested that since the Air India A310s had repeated hydraulic problems, declare the A310 design as "UNSAFE?" ..If there was ever a truckload of crap..
Its like saying, a Maruti800 has an accident, so all Maruti800s are unsafe..even after 20 years of production and over a million cars on the road.
I think some sort of moratorium should be imposed on media for reporting aviation matters. They should be compulsorily made to undergo awareness courses on aviation industry.
I know it is an issue in general as aviation is little understood by the general public, but our useless media has just another excuse to excrete its vomitload on the ignorant public.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mrniji
Member


Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 55
Location: FRA

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 8:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the first instance I would say, a matter of a bad coincidence.. but Sunderbans makes me think... the only resolution: get the 777s as fast as possible and get rid of these aircraft

Quote:

If AI MX standards were poor, this aircraft would not have been flying for 21 years.


As usual, a good comment from Himmat! I fully agree. Why would LH make a JV with AI maintenance. First: AI maintenance is world class. Second: We should just be happy that all pax on both flights were safe. Of course, the likelihood that these pax ever take AI again is around 0, and the image of AI is impaired. However, the pilots were able to make a secure emergency landing and safe the life of the pax. Very well done.

Lets just hope that this won't happen in the future, and lessons are learnt!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am just sick of Indian Media. No doubt they do good job when needed, but more often then not they overdo things and scare the hell out of everyone. It was an emergency landing and the plane did land normally. Only while towing the nose gear collapsed.

I don't know if anyone has noticed it or not, but was the proper procedures followed to tow the already crippled aircraft away?? It may as well be the fault of the ground crews that resulted in A310 collapsing. But then this is just a possibility.

Cheers
Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sammyk
Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 2719
Location: Austin, TX

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ssbmat wrote:

This on-field reporter had the temerity to suggest that Airbus Industrie does not supply any spares for A310, simply because it is currently not in production!!


Technically the A310 is still in production, at least until June or July. Of course I doubt they are taking any new orders for them. Hell, I think FedEx is still taking delivery of new A300s.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
blrsea
Member


Joined: 25 Mar 2007
Posts: 182

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A-I glitches: Lufthansa said no to maintenance deal

Quote:
The question mark on Air-India’s maintenance services can be gauged from the fact that Lufthansa, the German carrier, declined an alliance on maintenance services last year after its own checks showed that Air-India’s productivity was barely 25 per cent as far as maintenance services mattered and its practices well below the mark.

Making maintenance matters worse, Air-India’s engineers, under various unions, have been engaged in battles with the management over wage revision. This, sources said, had contributed to the falling maintenance practices. The carrier has in the past been the subject of Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)-mandated surveillances to ascertain whether maintenance procedures and practices were being compromised.

Today’s incidents also showed the poor response preparedness. The relief aircraft, carrying personnel and equipment to remove the Airbus whose nose gear capsized while it was being towed away, came a good eight hours after the flight, with a technical snag in the locking system of the front landing gear, made an emergency landing. As a result, several flight schedules were thrown out of gear.

“Since the aircraft blocked the main runway hampering operations, the priority was to get it removed from there. However, Air-India’s relief aircraft reached Delhi only at around 4 pm. The airline could have reacted faster considering the nature of the problem,” said sources in the Civil Aviation Ministry.

While launching investigations into the incidents, DGCA officials said that “going through an elimination process, we would look at all possibilities”. They indicated that “heads would roll” if any maintenance practices were found to have been violated.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Express ahead as usual!!! Must be a disgruntled employee out to capitalise on the issue.

Also like that line about "heads will roll". Once the union concerned serves a strike notice, the management will only end up rolling its eyes.

Express report anyway has a few goofups. Says in one emergency, the aircraft had to dump fuel over the ocean (clearly showing a lack of understanding of emergency procedures in some situations)!!!
And in another case, Air India has a 747-800!!!


***
Just to add, never got the "promised" email from Air India PR. Called up again just now. The guy is too spaced out and fatigued. Two incidents and explaining what happened to the media has been just too much for them.
Back to top
maut3000
Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 160
Location: Mumbai

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

karatecatman wrote:
It's a wet lease with three sets of CZA flight crew and a few senior cabin crew.

Will mainly do India-SE Asia and a few Gulf routes. Will also be used o the Mumbai-Delhi corridor.


CZA has taken over the BOM-BKK-HKG route.
Plus it is currently operated on BOM-DEL-KUL on Tue, Thu
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Dipanjan Mallik
Member


Joined: 25 Jan 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OMG it has been more than 24 hrs and the plane is still there blocking the main runway it has been more than 24 hrs Shocked and still the AI engg r not upto any soution they say they r takin their time as they dont want to cause any more damage to the 20 yr old aircraft Evil or Very Mad can someone pls explain AI that its time that they dump their 20 yr old palne this time the nose wheel broke when it was being towed nxt time it might hve to do a belly landing which they thought of doing this time and God knows what will happen to the 20 yr old plane.Its high time they shld realise and dump thier old planes and properly maintain the ones they have or in the future they will hve to fly empty planes as no passenger is going to risk their life.
Oh another thing a American Airlines(united airlines) pilot has decieded to use the full runway length of 3800 mts for his Boeing 777 so that flight has been rescheduled to evening other carriers r using the secondary runway.
_________________
C mah blog http://avationfreak.blogspot.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 12:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Airbus Industrie is on standby after Air India contacted them. Airbus team might fly in in a day or two.
They are to be a part of the DGCA probe.

***
Air India releases on the "accident"

April 9, 2007
Update on AI-349 Shanghai-Bangkok-Delhi-Mumbai as on 3:30 p.m.


Passenger safety is of paramount importance to Air India. The experienced pilot of Air India ensured a smooth landing of the aircraft without causing discomfort to any passenger. In flight announcements were also being made periodically to ensure passengers are well aware of the situation.

Meanwhile, the Delhi IG Airport runway was blocked temporarily as a precautionary safety measure. The lights have been installed by the Airport authorities on the run way to demarcate the area which cannot be used. The run way is now open partially.


**

Air India AI-736 Dubai – Delhi Flight had to make an emergency landing at Delhi IG airport in the afternoon due to minor error in the landing signal. The aircraft landed safely with all the passengers onboard. All 54 passengers have been disembarked. The aircraft which is wet leased from a foreign operator has been towed away for a general safety check.

**

Air India flight AI-349 Shanghai-Bangkok-Delhi-Mumbai of 9th April 2007, made an emergency landing in Delhi at 6:35 a.m due to a technical snag in the locking system of the front landing gear. The aircraft landed safely with all the passengers onboard. The commander used all emergency procedures as per the safety manual and brought the aircraft to a halt on the run way. The passengers were disembarked using the step ladder. However, when the aircraft was being towed away from the runway to a remote bay for repair through a taxi track, the nose gear capsized as a result of which further operations were affected.

The 134 Mumbai bound passengers from Delhi, are being accommodated on an Indian Airlines flight, scheduled to depart at 12:30 pm from the domestic terminal. The remaining 57 passengers, already aboard AI-349, have been given the option to board the Mumbai bound Indian Airlines flight along with the other passengers, without their baggage. Their baggage would be delivered directly at the Mumbai airport.

Meanwhile Air India officials along with DGCA experts are already on the spot investigating the incident, and the aircraft is being towed to a safer place for repair by using a recovery kit.

The Air India staff at Delhi are taking all measures to assist the passengers and deeply regrets the inconvenience caused.
Back to top
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Air India is supoosed to be still affected by the loss of $10 million worth of spares in the July 7 Mumbai floods. It field an insurance claim for that.


***
www.telegraphindia.com/1070410/asp/frontpage/story_7628754.asp

Bloody nose for A-I, twice in a day
- Warning rings true as two flights make emergency landings in Delhi


Quotes:
But Dinesh Trivedi, member of the Parliamentary committee, blamed poor repairs and maintenance.

“They (Air-India) have been lax. Older planes, both Boeing and Airbus, are flying perfectly safely throughout the world,” the MP said.

“The spares are often bought from sources other than manufacturers. There is often a shortage of competent engineers.”

Trivedi said he was shocked when the ministry report cited a hydraulic failure caused by the failure of a plane’s brake system line at Jeddah, which he termed “not (just) dangerous but extremely so. Today’s case seems to be suspiciously similar.”

The report identified 10 “problem areas” that are often struck by hydraulic failures. These include the hydraulic pressure switch, pitch trimmer supply hose, actuator, hydraulic seals, thrust reversor actuators, nose-wheel steering hoses and the rudder supply hose.

About Airbus A 310 planes, the ministry said, “Additional inspections and modifications have been introduced. Airbus has suggested new installation procedures, which are proposed to be introduced.”

The report said some of the problems had been sorted out, but a “few areas still need improvements which have been taken up with the manufacturer/vendor”.

Trivedi said, “We cannot wait for fatalities before we act. Someone will have to explain to the paying public what is being done to make these aircraft safe.”
Back to top
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Justin Dubon, Airbus’ regional press manager has reacted from London: ‘‘Airbus is aware of this and has made contact with Air India. We will study why this happened and make recommendations.’’
Back to top
the_380
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2329
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 3:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
But Dinesh Trivedi, member of the Parliamentary committee, blamed poor repairs and maintenance.

Somebody kill him Evil or Very Mad

Quote:
Trivedi said, “We cannot wait for fatalities before we act. Someone will have to explain to the paying public what is being done to make these aircraft safe.”

So why doesn't he purchase some spares and donate them to AI ? im sure he'd be rich enought to do that.
Or alteaslt ask him to shut his mouth next time PP presents the budget for some new AI spares
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
himmat01
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 1392
Location: DEL

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Post deleted.
_________________
Save Maharashtra!


Last edited by himmat01 on Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:46 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dinesh Trivedi webpage:
http://164.100.24.167:8080/members/Website/Mainweb.asp?mpcode=548

Check under "My Biodata"
Back to top
Nimish
Member


Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Posts: 9757
Location: Bangalore, India

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Somebody kill him


{sarcastic} Might not be very long - he just has to keep flying AI. {/sarcastic}

Can we please keep these silly immature statements like "Somebody kill him" out? After all, besides "poor repairs and MX" what else could you attribute a mechanical failure to? And AI is famous for it's "world class MX" but aircraft that keep failing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Aiel
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 927
Location: Bangalore

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Was watching a report on one of the news channels, kept repeating shots of an AI L1011. Laughing
_________________
My Flickr photos

My JP.net account
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
the_380
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2329
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
After all, besides "poor repairs and MX" what else could you attribute a mechanical failure to? And AI is famous for it's "world class MX" but aircraft that keep failing.

And what do you blame for poor repairs ? Rolling Eyes
AI gets its Mx staff trained at high expenses, so if spares are not available they have to manage with whatever possible.
Airlines likw SQ and EK don't face such situations because they have aircrafts ready for stand by AND they have ample of spares needed.
Now please don't ask who has to get those spares
_________________
http://www.myspace.com/avsatsworld
A Walt Disney and 20th Century Fox Audio Producer!!! Very Happy
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
vt-snc
Member


Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The reportage in the media was terrible to say the least... the passenger who came on X factor show on NDTV said that the plane (AI-349) landed on its third attempt...

fact is that the pilot got warning signals that his landing gear was not extended fully and locked... after hovering over DEL and in consultation with the ATC it was decided that the pilot made two low fly pasts over the runway so that the engineers could make a visual inspection of the landing gear. After two passes, the pilot was given the OK and he landed. The same happened in the case of the other flight (AI 736) as well.

The pilot of flight 349 (VT-EJJ) 'Beas' requested for pax disembarkation on the runway itself and while the a/c was being towed, the nose landing gear got unlocked and retracted on the junction of r/way 28-10 and t/way November. As a result the a/c tilted and fell on the ground.

The AI team reached DEL and assessed the situation and the salvage work started at around 1900 IST. It took time for the bags to be inserted below the a/c and inflated (takes 2 hrs to inflate them) and several attempts had to be made as the angle was awkward. AI staff did a pretty decent job I would say.

The other flight AI 736 (CS-TLQ) was only a suspected case, and upon landing a thorough inspection was made and then the a/c proceeded on its next flight without much problem.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vt-snc wrote:
The reportage in the media was terrible to say the least...


The two best journalist that even come close to correct reporting about aviation are Vishnu Som of NDTV and Karma Pajore of TV18(CNN-IBN). I generally tend to ignore anyother news from other reporters.

Cheers
Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Boeing7xx
Member


Joined: 23 Dec 2006
Posts: 477
Location: WSSS

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Couldn't see the accused aircraft around the runway, but did see the american bird parked and was a little curious to see a kingfisher bird parked in the international bay. Does anyone know where is the a/c lying now? or has the nose wheel been put back in place?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 10:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

the_380 wrote:
Quote:
After all, besides "poor repairs and MX" what else could you attribute a mechanical failure to? And AI is famous for it's "world class MX" but aircraft that keep failing.

And what do you blame for poor repairs ? Rolling Eyes


I blame the lax attitude of people in this country and lack of responsibility. Unfortunately our great country, despite the progress that it has made, suffers from people witth "CHALTA HAI" attatude and failure to take on responsibility.
Maintainence is not proper - "CHALTA HAI"
correct spares not there - "JUGAR KAR LO"

These things should be avoided. People here think that public property is not their's and they are least bothered for the same.

IMO i don't think anyone will be held accoountable for the mishap here also and i doubt any lesson's will be learned in this episode also. We need to change here.

Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vt-snc
Member


Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 5

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="Boeing7xx"]Does anyone know where is the a/c lying now? or has the nose wheel been put back in place?[/quote]

--

VT-EJJ is now in the Air India maintenance facility on the south-west end of the airport (near the remote stands for int'l aircraft). The nose wheel had not broken, but had unlocked and gone back to retracted position. It is still on but has been provided support. My guess is that it'll be at least 2 weeks before the a/c gets back in the air.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

VT-SNC
Your reporting is Smile .

If what you have said was put on on TV, there would have been no hysteria. Half the mess was caused by Mr. Dinesh Trivedi, who has even gone to the extent of calling the A310s as flying coffins.


***
Prelim report from DGCA/Air India says:
The airbus had problems with its landing gear.
Preliminary investigations point towards ‘‘technical issues connected with the landing gear equipment’’.
On the 767, the problem was with the landing gear indicator on the instrument panel.

***
But will all this be put forth to the public again? The damage done by the TV reporting has been enormous.
Back to top
Nimish
Member


Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Posts: 9757
Location: Bangalore, India

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

karatecatman wrote:
VT-SNC
Your reporting is Smile .


Agreed! Cool

karatecatman wrote:
If what you have said was put on on TV, there would have been no hysteria. Half the mess was caused by Mr. Dinesh Trivedi, who has even gone to the extent of calling the A310s as flying coffins.


Actually I would disagree. A lot of the mess is caused by poor PR from AI - they should have been prompt in getting an analysis and then sending a PR update or talking to the media. As you yourself saw - they were clueless about the incident until you called them, so there's no chance to expect them to give any actual feedback to the media. Hence the media has to rely on "others".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, the AI PR who was on air at the same time as Trivedi had to actually play second fiddle. There was two times when after Trivedi spoke, the AI PR guy kept saying "As the Honourable Member of Parliament has said."
So AI's hands are tied ... answerable to its owners -- the babus and ministers and Parliamentary committees.
Back to top
kam
Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 54
Location: CVT

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

looks like ATQ had a bit of a drama yesterday, A Turkmenistan plane burst a tyre on landing, anyone esle shed any more light on this. The article says it was an airbus but Turkmenistan fly Boeings and old russian TU aircraft I though

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070411/main4.htm
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stealthpilot
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2325
Location: BLR, DXB

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nimish wrote:

After all, besides "poor repairs and MX" what else could you attribute a mechanical failure to? And AI is famous for it's "world class MX" but aircraft that keep failing.


Thank you Nimish, I was hoping someone would say that.
If its not poor maintenance what is it? Things go bad with aircrafts, I am well aware of that. However the frequency of incidences like these seems rather high doesn’t it? Granted, the media makes a bigger deal out of it than if 9W or DN had a problem, but still.
Do we simply disregard incidences like these as ‘bad luck’?
the_380 wrote:

AI gets its Mx staff trained at high expenses, so if spares are not available they have to manage with whatever possible.

And that my friend = bad maintenance.
Ok, so their staff are trained blah blah I agree. But if their staff for whatever reason doesn’t have spares that directly implies bad maintenance.
vt-snc wrote:

The AI team reached DEL and assessed the situation and the salvage work started at around 1900 IST. It took time for the bags to be inserted below the a/c and inflated (takes 2 hrs to inflate them) and several attempts had to be made as the angle was awkward. AI staff did a pretty decent job I would say.

Is it AIs job to move the aircraft or AAIs? In either case, there has to be some system in place to deal with problems like these faster and more efficiently.
_________________
eP007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 8132
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What caused the NLG collapse during Towing.
Such repairs would probably take a forthnight depending on the work scope.

As for the media talk....Get the Experts on.Else its a comedy show Smile

regds
MEL
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
iflytb20
Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2007
Posts: 1079
Location: Next to the Airport

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kam wrote:
looks like ATQ had a bit of a drama yesterday, A Turkmenistan plane burst a tyre on landing, anyone esle shed any more light on this. The article says it was an airbus but Turkmenistan fly Boeings and old russian TU aircraft I though

http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070411/main4.htm


ya..i saw the bird today morning...looked in one piece..was parked overnight with all the covers installed..guess they did not have a spare wheel Wink hence got stuck..it was a B757-200
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
maut3000
Member


Joined: 14 Mar 2007
Posts: 160
Location: Mumbai

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stealthpilot wrote:


If its not poor maintenance what is it? Things go bad with aircrafts, I am well aware of that. However the frequency of incidences like these seems rather high doesn’t it? Granted, the media makes a bigger deal out of it than if 9W or DN had a problem, but still.
Do we simply disregard incidences like these as ‘bad luck’?


I agree with you but ........
I was glancing through a list of Air accidents in 2006 in one of the Airline magazines. There were around 200 accidents categorized in Fatal and Non-Fatal category. The best airlines in the world had names in Non-Fatal category including Lufthansa, Quatas, BA, KLM and Emirates. Would try to find out the magazine again, if possible. The indian cariiers (all of them) seemed to be doing pretty well. Very Happy (obviously none of the major world airlines had a mention in the fatal category).

Makes me wonder if we blame our carriers too much. Only a few years back, Indian's ground services were abused by media as well customers for being rough. Now that Kingfisher also outsources it ground handling to Indian, we rarely hear anything about it, at least in the news.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also in Media, we tend to hear about the incidents that take place at major airports like DEL, BOM, Chennai or KOL. But those incidents that take place in small airports like say Udaipur or rajkot don't get as much media attention as incidents at bigger airports. Am i correct??

Cheers
Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 8132
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its a pity that the media does not get Aviation experts to talk on an Incident related to Aviation,whereas Expert opinion is sought on Cricket.
Smile
regds
MEL
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
stealthpilot
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2325
Location: BLR, DXB

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

maut3000 wrote:

Makes me wonder if we blame our carriers too much. Only a few years back, Indian's ground services were abused by media as well customers for being rough. Now that Kingfisher also outsources it ground handling to Indian, we rarely hear anything about it, at least in the news.

An Air Deccan ATR had an LG collapse in Bangalore, S2's famous one in Bombay, another one in Goa..... etc.... all within the past year or so.
O definitely people keep a closer eye on AI than other carriers; we don’t exactly know how much is media hype and what isnt.
_________________
eP007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 8132
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2007 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Let me assure you.Not all Incidents get media coverage.There are Employees that have ctcs with the Media to report on any happenings at the Airport.Then the mobile vans try to get a view from outside.
Smile
regds
MEL
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Another incident.
The same 767 seems to have another technical snag, but this time AI was trying to send the passengers on the IA Dubai flight.

Media reports talk of a wet leased 737. Has to be the 767.
Back to top
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 22, 2007 12:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has been clarified.
Its now the turn of the 757!!!


154 passengers have been shifted to hotels and "Air India has fed them at its own expense!!!"


Also, an IA flight seems to have ad an emergency.
Story below:

http://www.indiaenews.com/india/20070422/48397.htm
Back to top
karatecatman
Guest





PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Praful Patel has said in Parliament that the enquiry into the nose landing gear snag has been completed.
The enquiry indicated that the telescoping drag strut of the Nose Landing Gear of the aircraft was ‘‘defective’’ and the aircraft is in Mumbai for permanent repairs as advised by the manufacturer, Airbus Industrie, Civil Aviation Minister Praful Patel said during Question Hour.
Another Boeing B-767, which reported a similar snag in Delhi on the same day, had its defect rectified and went back into service, he said.
‘‘The incident is under investigation and the recommendations will be complied with as and when it is complete,’’ the Minister said.
He also said 620 additional air traffic controllers were required in various grades to meet the demand at existing and upcoming airports.
In the last two-and-a-half-year, 371 junior executive ATCs have been inducted by the Airports Authority of India and action for filling up other posts was continuing, he said.
Back to top
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 8132
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

karatecatman wrote:

In the last two-and-a-half-year, 371 junior executive ATCs have been inducted by the Airports Authority of India and action for filling up other posts was continuing, he said.


Are these Thru IAF or Civilians.
regds
MEL
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Civil Aviation All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com