Important Notice:
We regret to inform you that our free phpBB forum hosting service will be discontinued by the end of June 30, 2024.
If you wish to migrate to our paid hosting service, please contact billing@hostonnet.com.
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11365 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 2:56 am Post subject: Air France Flight 447 wreckage finally found |
|
|
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12953432
Wreckage from Air France jet found in Atlantic
3 April 2011
Wreckage from an Air France jet lost over the Atlantic nearly two years ago with 228 people on board has been found, French investigators say.
With the cause of the crash still unknown, a fourth attempt to locate the plane's voice and data recorders got under way last month.
Searchers located wreckage during the past 24 hours, investigators in Paris said, without giving details.
Flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris came down in a storm on 1 June 2009.
A French judge recently filed preliminary manslaughter charges against Air France over the crash.
Airbus, the maker of the jet, says no one can know for sure how the crash occurred unless the so-called "black boxes" are found.
The search has been financed jointly by Air France and Airbus. It involves dives to depths of up to 4,000m (13,120ft) with the use of special robots to examine the ocean floor between Brazil and West Africa.
'No guarantee'
France's Bureau of Investigations and Analysis (BEAR) said that plane parts of the plane had been located by the searchers, led by Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
“These parts have been identified by BEA investigators as belonging to the wreck of the A330-203, Flight AF 447”
French Bureau of Investigations and Analysis "These parts have been identified by BEA investigators as belonging to the wreck of the A330-203, Flight AF 447," it added.
The bureau promised to release further information later.
An initial search found 50 bodies and hundreds of pieces of the plane, including its torn-off tail, while the last search ended in failure in May 2010.
The latest search was planned as a "systematic exploration" of an area of some 10,000 sq km (3,900 sq miles).
Officials have previously said there can be no guarantee that the flight recorders will ever be found.
Those who died included more than 30 nationalities. Most were French, Brazilian or German.
The crash has been partially blamed on malfunctioning speed sensors but officials believe other factors must also have contributed.
_________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11365 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bodies found from 09 plane crash in Atlantic still inside fuselage
Authorities confirmed that bodies have been found, but considering the nature of the find, the details of how and where they were found will be told to the families first. Things such as passengers still strapped in their seats, if this is indeed the case, is something that the authorities want to tell the families before releasing details to the media.
http://www.huliq.com/12079/bodies-found-09-plane-crash-atlantic-still-inside-fuselage _________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shivendrashukla Member
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 1354 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great job done by BEA. It is like finding a needle in a haystack. May all those who perished in this tragedy, rest in peace.
Shivendra |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2011 3:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Amazing find....Now lets hope the CVR/FDR is found & the Mystery unwound. _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yash777 Member
Joined: 12 Jun 2007 Posts: 901 Location: Chicago, IL
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Air France crash flight recorder found
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2011/04/27/Air-France-crash-flight-recorder-found/UPI-90251303942971/
A robot submarine located the flight data recorder from Air France Flight 447 that crashed in the Atlantic in 2009, but its data are missing, officials say.
The search by the robot submersible for the wreckage of the airliner, which crashed in the equatorial Atlantic in June 2009 on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, began last month, NewsScientist.com reported Wednesday.
The flight recorder is missing a crucial component called the Crash Survivable Memory unit, which records and holds the all-important flight data in solid-state memory chips, said officials of the Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses, the French government's air crash investigator.
"It [the recorder] was surrounded by debris from other parts of the airplane," the BEA said in a statement.
"The searches are continuing," the BEA said, with hopes the memory component will be found nearby in the debris field.
All 228 passengers and crew on flight were killed when it went down into the Atlantic in heavy weather. _________________ Jetphotos Flickr gallery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yash777 wrote: | Air France crash flight recorder found
|
The DFDR minus the CSMU _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iflytb20 wrote: | yash777 wrote: | Air France crash flight recorder found
|
The DFDR minus the CSMU |
Which, practically means it would be useless unless the CSMU is also located, isnt it??
This incident has been discussed dime-a-dozen in various fora, and perhaps I am repeating..but I somehow get the feeling that the flight-crew were significantly "incapacitated" during this event. Something terrible happened, enough to upset the Autopilot, as well as incapacitate the pilots.
How come there was NO distress call ? I understand the principle of Aviate, Navigate and Communicate, but all things failing, pilots would normally raise the M'Aidez call, wouldnt they ? Even in a flat dive or inverted dive, wouldnt one of them atleast communicate over the radio?
What was the cataclysmic event that prevented this much activity, which is normally so "ingrained" in the pilots training and regimen?
Did they encounter a lightning strike that shattered the cockpit windows, and the resulting debris knocked out the crew unconscious ?? That would explain the lack of control over the erratic manuevers as evidenced from the ACARS messages. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sri_bom Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2006 Posts: 2365 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 3:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Curious to know, I understand that the plane went through a bad storm, but if the aircraft was a 4 holer like the 747 would it have been able to ride the storm out? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The APU _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wait a minute..so the APU, which is housed in the fuselage just below the tail, went down intact and infact SUNK to a great depth, but the tail itself was found floating on the surface ??
Then again, the engines and the fwd landing gear, and most of the fuselage went down several hundred (thousand?) metres, but some parts of the galley were floating on the surface??
What kind of an impact was this ? Did the tail break off before the rest of the fuselage ?
Did the fuselage break up somewhat in mid-air?
Purely looking at how and where the airplane parts have been found, would it not be possible to look at scenarios ?
It just seems bizarre that significant portions of the plane sunk to a great depth..if this was a high-velocity high vertical-angle impact, the plane would have broken up into several parts , wouldnt it?
Did the plane ultimately make a shallow dive into the sea, snapping off the tailplane in the process ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They found the CSMU
_________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss
Last edited by iflytb20 on Mon May 02, 2011 12:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 12:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
ssbmat wrote: | Wait a minute..so the APU, which is housed in the fuselage just below the tail, went down intact and infact SUNK to a great depth, but the tail itself was found floating on the surface ??
Then again, the engines and the fwd landing gear, and most of the fuselage went down several hundred (thousand?) metres, but some parts of the galley were floating on the surface??
What kind of an impact was this ? Did the tail break off before the rest of the fuselage ?
Did the fuselage break up somewhat in mid-air?
Purely looking at how and where the airplane parts have been found, would it not be possible to look at scenarios ?
It just seems bizarre that significant portions of the plane sunk to a great depth..if this was a high-velocity high vertical-angle impact, the plane would have broken up into several parts , wouldnt it?
Did the plane ultimately make a shallow dive into the sea, snapping off the tailplane in the process ? |
As per the BEA who is investigating the accident, the aircraft hit the sea with about 5 deg nose up, very little forward speed and a very high rate of descent. Considering that the tail is mostly composites, and as a result lighter, it would have a high chance of floating. In a lot of AB crashes, the tail was found intact [well almost] and floating. Two examples that i can remember are the AA A300 crash and the Air New Zealand A320 crash.
As per the reports, the tail snapped off at impact when the tailcone smashed into it from below. _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Some excerpts from the BEA Interim report. For full report click here
Quote: | Most of the parts found were low-density honeycomb or composite
material parts |
Quote: | The vertical stabiliser’s side panels did not show signs of compression damage. The breaks seen at the level of the lateral load pick-up rods were the result of the backwards movement of the attachments and centre and aft frames. The observations made on the vertical stabiliser are not consistent with a failure due to lateral loads in flight.
The observations made on the debris (toilet doors, partitions, galleys, cabin crew rest module, spoiler, aileron, vertical stabiliser) evidenced high rates of compression resulting from a high rate of descent at the time of impact with the water. This high rate of compression can be seen all over the aircraft and symmetrically on the right- and left-hand sides.
High levels of loading would be required to cause the damage observed forward of the vertical stabiliser (compression failure of the forward attachment). These observations are not compatible with a separation of the aft part of the fuselage in flight
The damage found at the root of the vertical stabiliser was more or less
symmetrical, as were the deformations due to the high rate of ompression
observed on the various parts of the aircraft. This left-right symmetry means that the aircraft had low bank and little sideslip on impact.
The deformations of the fuselage frames at the root of the vertical stabiliser were not consistent with an aircraft nose-down attitude at the moment of impact.
From these observations it can be deduced that:
The aircraft was probably intact on impact.
The aircraft struck the surface of the water with a positive attitude, a low bank and a high rate of descent.
There was no depressurisation. |
_________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 8:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
This again begs a question, if the plane literally dropped into the sea with positive (nose up) attitude, shouldnt most of it have floated up instead if sinking to the sea bed ?
Did the pilots not try to level the wings in the final moments to make any sort of soft landing ?
TB20- if you can explain better- loss of lift, resulting in zero forward airspeed., what asymetrical condition would cause this for an airliner as large as the A330?. A plane cruising at (probably) M.82 or so, suddenly stalls, and from 35-37000 feet, it just drops like a large rock?
And I shudder to think of the final moments of the passengers, in an intact plane, they were probably all screaming, praying(?), terrified at the sudden vertical drop, atleast they didnt see the ocean loom up on them at night.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Mon May 02, 2011 11:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
ssbmat wrote: | This again begs a question, if the plane literally dropped into the sea with positive (nose up) attitude, shouldnt most of it have floated up instead if sinking to the sea bed ? |
An aircraft will float if its buoyancy has not been compromised. In case of AF447, it hit the sea with a very high rate of descent - some have calculated it to be greater than 8000 fpm. At that vertical velocity, the fuselage will break almost immediately and all the heavy items would sink to the bottom. All the floating debris found were the plastic and composite materials. As they are lighter than the rest of the airplane, they float.
ssbmat wrote: | TB20- if you can explain better- loss of lift, resulting in zero forward airspeed., what asymetrical condition would cause this for an airliner as large as the A330?. A plane cruising at (probably) M.82 or so, suddenly stalls, and from 35-37000 feet, it just drops like a large rock?
|
There are two situations that i know of which leads to a Low forward speed and a high vertical speed. A Deep or Super Stall and a Flat Spin.
The Deep stall usually affects T-Tailed aircraft [Like CRJs, ATRs etc] and recovery is next to impossible. The reason is that the wings turbulent airflow hits the tailplane and thereby reduces its effectiveness by shadowing it from clean airflow. As a result the elevator cannot be used to push the nose down and recover from the stall. A quite famous loss of aircraft in this was was a BEA Trident. Is is estimated to have impacted the ground with a rate of descent 4300 fpm and a forward velocity of less than 54 knots.
The Flat spin :
Quote: | In the past, some airplanes displayed an unrecoverable spin in which the nose was higher, relative to the horizon, than in conventional spins. This is sometimes called a Flat Spin, although whether a flat spin is indeed unrecoverable depends on aircraft type and loading. The plane spins on its belly around the normal axis. The empennage will feel very light and loose. Depending on the aircraft, changing the rudder and aileron inputs or engine power settings may have little effect. There is a small number of accounts where pilots recovered from flat spins by loosening their restraint harnesses and leaning forward in an attempt to alter the position of the center of gravity. |
In a Flat Spin, the Angle of Attack could be as high as 60-80 degrees. There have been a few examples of airlines being lost due to flat spin in the recent past. The Aeroflot A310 and the Pulkovo Flight 612 are two that i can quote off hand. _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the explanation, though I knew about the T-tail deep stall..But my point is, how come something so drastic happened that recovery was impossible even from 35-37000 feet ? In case of the Aeroflot A310 the kid yanked the controls..so that is a deliberate move. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Tue May 03, 2011 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
They found the CVR too
_________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HAWK21M Member
Joined: 19 Dec 2006 Posts: 8132 Location: Mumbai, INDIA
|
Posted: Wed May 04, 2011 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Eagerly Awaiting the SSCVR/SSFDR data results. _________________ Think of the Brighter side !!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Thu May 05, 2011 1:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Video showing the recovery operation of the FDR CSMU
YouTube _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
747-237 Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 11365 Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom
|
Posted: Mon May 09, 2011 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2011/05/09/356420/picture-one-of-af447s-engines-retrieved-from-sea-bed.html
One of AF447's engines retrieved from sea bed
09/05/11
One of the two General Electric CF6 engines of the crashed Air France Airbus A330, lost in the South Atlantic two years ago, has been raised from the sea bed.
Salvage efforts have continued following the location of the flight-data and cockpit-voice recorders from flight AF447, both of which are en route to the analysis laboratory of French investigation agency Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses.
With the priority task of retrieving the recorders completed, BEA says that it has started recovering structural parts of the twinjet.
It has lifted the avionics bay, with several computer systems from the A330, and one of its CF6 engines - it is unclear whether this is the starboard or port powerplant.
The recorders have been transferred from the Ile de Sein recovery vessel to a French naval patrol boat, La Capricieuse, which is taking the devices - under the watch of two investigators and a judicial police officer - to Cayenne in French Guiana.
BEA says the patrol boat should arrive in Cayenne on 11 May, from where they will be flown to its headquarters in Paris.
_________________ 11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
747-237 wrote: |
[i]One of AF447's engines retrieved from sea bed
09/05/11
|
Re-posting as the pic are not showing
Click for a bigger pic
One of the Engines
Click for a bigger pic
The Avionics bay _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 9:01 pm Post subject: Some more "Leaked" information |
|
|
Quote: | Stall led to Rio-Paris Air France crash, says German press
BERLIN - An Air France plane crashed into the Atlantic in 2009 because of a sudden stall, the German Spiegel magazine reported Sunday citing an expert involved in analysing data from the plane's flight recorders.
Investigators said on Friday they would announce initial official findings from their probe later this week.
Spiegel magazine, quoting an unamed expert, said the exact causes of the crash were not known, but data suggested the plane's speed probes, known as pitot tubes, iced up, resulting in the Airbus A330's failure to register correct airspeed.
The accident, which resulted in the death of all 228 people aboard the plane, happened over just four minutes, according to data from the flight recorders recovered last month from the bottom of the ocean.
According to the voice recorder, chief pilot Marc Dubois was not in the cockpit when an initial alarm rang out.
He is heard running into the cockpit and "shouting instructions to his two co-pilots," the expert told Spiegel.
The plane, en route from Rio de Janeiro to Paris on June 1, 2009, appeared to have avoided an area of strong turbulence, but its pitot tubes gathered ice particles from the weather front.
Then "the data recorder indicates an abrupt heaving of the machine shortly after airspeed indicators failed," the expert said.
This resulted in the plane's deep stall.
It was not clear if this was the result of pilot error, or if onboard computers had automatically kicked in to compensate for what appeared to be a sudden loss of power, the magazine said.
The case has been closely followed in Germany because 28 of the passengers were German. |
http://www2.canada.com/topics/news/world/story.html?id=4824275 _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2011 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah..of course the plane lost lift..thats why it crashed..what a superb conclusion
1) If the tubes iced over, couldnt the pilots have maintained some sort of a shallow dive to bring the plane down to lets say, 10000 feet? wouldnt that have ""freed up the ice"? Would it be so difficult to maintain level flight after that ?
Also, would the plane have lost altitude reference ? I guess the pitot tubes are meant for airspeed only or no?
Are we saying that pitot tubes are SO Critical that ice ingestion leads to only one possible result- catastrophic loss of flight control.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shivendrashukla Member
Joined: 21 Dec 2006 Posts: 1354 Location: Mumbai, India
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Air France crash pilots lost vital speed data, say investigators
Quote: | (CNN) -- Pilots of the Air France flight that crashed in 2009 and plummeted 38,000 ft in just three minutes and 30 seconds, lost vital speed data, France's Bureau of Investigation and Analysis (BEA) said Friday.
Pilots on the aircraft got conflicting air speeds in the minutes leading up to the crash, the interim reports states. The aircraft climbed to 38,000 ft when "the stall warning was triggered and the airplane stalled," the report says.
Aviation experts are asking why the pilots responded to the stall by pulling the nose up instead of pushing it down to recover.
Miles O'Brien, a pilot and aviation analyst, said: "You push down on the wheel to gain air speed, perhaps they (pilots) were getting information that the air speed was too high. Pulling the nose up will exacerbate an aerodynamic stall."
The speed displayed on the left primary flight display were "inconsistent" with those on the integrated standby instrument system (ISIS), the report says.
What caused the Air France crash?
Map: Air France Flight 447
RELATED TOPICS
Air France Flight 447
Airbus A330
The aircraft experienced some "rolling" before stalling and then descending rapidly into the ocean. The descent lasted 3 minutes and 30 seconds and the engines remained operational, said the report. It plunged at 10,912 feet (3,300 meters) per minute.
At the time of the descent, the two co-pilots and captain were in the aircraft cockpit.
How aircraft speed sensors work
Richard Quest, CNN's aviation expert, said: "For whatever reason the aircraft speed sensors failed and the A330 went into a high altitude stall. The pilot's actions were unable to recover the aircraft and some might say, made the bad situation worse.
"The actual falling from the sky will have been horrific. This plane fell out of the sky."
All 228 people aboard the Airbus A330 Flight 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris were killed on June 1, 2009.
The pilots lost contact with air traffic controllers while flying across an area of the Atlantic Ocean known for constant bands of severe turbulence.
Air crash investigators at the Paris-based BEA have been working on the theory that the speed sensors, known as pitot tubes or probes, malfunctioned because of ice at high altitude.
Since the accident, Air France has replaced the pitots on its Airbus fleet with a newer model.
The report quotes some of the pilot's conversation -- who were not named -- and reveals that they were aware of the upcoming turbulence and storm.
In tech's golden age, why can't black boxes do more?
Four hours and six minutes into the flight, one of the co-pilots, referred to as PF, called the cabin crew, telling them that: "In two minutes we should enter an area where it'll move about a bit more than at the moment, you should watch out... I'll call you back as soon as we're out of it."
The actual falling from the sky will have been horrific. This plane fell out of the sky
--Richard Quest, CNN's aviation expert
The report said that four hours and 10 minutes into the flight: "The autopilot [and] then [the] auto-thrust disengaged," and co-pilot PF said: "I have the controls." The report said the stall warning sounded twice in a row.
A short time later the other co-pilot, referred to as PNF said: "So, we've lost the speeds." A second later the stall warnings sounded again the report said.
At about this time, "The speed displayed on the left side increased sharply," the report said. The aircraft was then at an altitude of about 37,500 ft.
The report said that at this time co-pilot PNF tried several times to call the captain back to the cockpit.
The aircraft then climbed to 38,000 ft and at around four hours 11 minutes and 40 seconds into the flight, the captain re-entered the cockpit. During the following seconds all of the recorded speeds became invalid and the stall warning stopped, the report said.
Co-pilot PF said: "I don't have any more indications," and the co-pilot PNF said "we have no valid indications."
About a minute later co-pilot the PF said: "We're going to arrive at level one hundred." This is a height of 10,000ft. About fifteen seconds later, the data recorder indicate "simultaneous inputs by both pilots on the sidesticks."
The recordings stopped at four hours 14 minutes and 28 seconds into the flight. A full investigation into the crash is expected next year.
Airbus, manufacturers of the A330, said: "The BEA's work constitutes a significant step towards the identification of the complete chain of events that led to the tragic accident. Airbus is committed to continuing to provide support to the BEA investigation with the objective of identifying all potential lessons to be learnt," according to the Press Association.
Earlier this week French air crash investigators said they would be able to identify two bodies recovered this month from the crash site. The recovery team is now working on retrieving all the bodies, French officials have said.
In early May search teams found the crucial "data recorders" from the wreck site, estimated to lie at a depth of between 2,000 to 4,000 meters (6,562 to 13,124 feet). |
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/americas/05/27/air.france.447.crash/index.html?hpt=T1
--Shivendra |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iflytb20 Member
Joined: 27 Jan 2007 Posts: 1079 Location: Next to the Airport
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Follow this Link for the official release by BEA - the investigating agency _________________ Always do everything into wind...... except piss |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Sat May 28, 2011 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a lot of interesting discussion about the Pilot's actions pre-entry into the stall and the actions (of lack thereof) during the stall.
I am not sure if they were getting reliable airspeed readings for quite some time prior to entry of the stall. Are we saying that the pitot tubes froze instantly, leading to AP/disengage?
Perhaps the pitot tubes were inconsistent in the few early minutes before the stall. If the PFD/ASI was showing M.82, was it really at M.82 or slightly slower already ?
Somehow their inability to control the plane in alternate law and the fact that they had a nose-up during the stall to climb, perplexes me. If A/T was disengaged, then I cant imagine they climbed up from 350 to 380, all the while when the airspeed started to bleed off. Did they apply manual thrust ?
And then having to counter the 40deg roll..something is just not right.
Did the pilots fail to apply Stick-and rudder principles (applicable from Cessna152 onwards) ?
What could they not do that they had to call in the Captain ?
Just 4 minutes from a near serene cruise ( perhaps with drinks and dinner being served, passengers enjoying movies or dozing off in flatbeds) to catastrophic plunge into the ocean. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
texdravid Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 971 Location: GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
What does this whole accident investigation look like to the average person on the street who is not a pilot?
1). Chief pilot was asleep or on "rest" and it took several attempts to reach him before he re-entered cockpit.
2). Why didn't he immediately get back into the left seat and get things in order? Evidently he did not.
3). The relief pilot/first officer looks like in retrospect that he was in over his head.
4). Complete lack of situational awareness by the first officer/relief pilot.
5). Finally, can the over reliance on computers doing the flying on modern aircraft dull the senses of old fashioned flying techniques, in the same sense that calculators have dulled the senses of modern school students in the mathematical sciences?
6). Any way you look at it, preliminarily, Air France better start looking for their checkbook....it's going to get ugly, nasty, and expensive. Your pilots I think messed up big time. _________________ "A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Proud Conservative in exile, soon to reawaken...
Charter member, Indians against Obama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ssbmat Member
Joined: 20 Dec 2006 Posts: 1710
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
texdravid wrote: | What does this whole accident investigation look like to the average person on the street who is not a pilot?
6). Any way you look at it, preliminarily, Air France better start looking for their checkbook....it's going to get ugly, nasty, and expensive. Your pilots I think messed up big time. |
I think it also raises some more questions about the system controlling the primary surfaces.
The Horizontal Stab-was at 13deg attitude, and remained so , inspite of the pilots attempt to nose-down at a particular stage..this is quite disconcerting.
There is a theory going around that Airbus hasnt fully explained the control of the Horizontal Stab (using manual Trim) during extreme flight situations..
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,765764-2,00.html
I know its Der Spiegel et al, but something's not quite right.
I get the feeling that it looks similar to AA587 ..Airbus did not provide adequate information in terms of training/operating guideline and pilots didnt take the right action..a deadly combination. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
texdravid Member
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 971 Location: GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it looks more like the Colgan air incident:
Colgan air # 3407 to Buffalo. Stall exacerbated by improper pilot maneuvers; i.e. pulling up and only slightly increasing power instead of nose down and going full throttle up.
While there are differences, in essence, both flight crews did not respond to the problem at hand, which was a stall. In fact, their actions made it worse, and caused the aircraft loss. _________________ "A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx." Ronald Reagan
Proud Conservative in exile, soon to reawaken...
Charter member, Indians against Obama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|