Airliners-India.com Forum Index Airliners-India.com
Flickr Group & Facebook
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

IAF C-130J crashes, 5 killed

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Military Aviation & Space
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:17 pm    Post subject: IAF C-130J crashes, 5 killed Reply with quote

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/IAF-aircraft-C-130J-Super-Hercules-crashes-near-Gwalior-5-killed/articleshow/32838303.cms

IAF aircraft C-130 J Super Hercules crashes, 5 killed

recently acquired C-130J transport aircraft of the Indian Air Force crashed 72 miles west of Gwalior airbase on Friday morning, killing at least five personnel on board.

The IAF has no official word yet on how many personnel were aboard the aircraft.

The crash of the four-engine US made aircraft has baffled experienced pilots, given its safety records and extreme agility. One senior air force pilot said the accident was "bizarre", and speculated that either the crew was incapacitated or a fire broke out aboard the plane.

Rescue operations are underway at the crash site, air force sources said. "The aircraft was airborne from Agra at 10am for a routine flying training mission. A court of inquiry has been ordered to investigate into the cause of the accident," the IAF said in a statement.

The crash took place in Karauli district in Rajasthan, some 72 miles from Gwalior, where it was due to land.

_________________
11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aseem
Member


Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 2841
Location: YYZ

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I tell you what happened... some foolhardy pilot or instructor didn't find his macho enough to follow the rules. "chalta hai"

VT-ASJ
_________________
[url=http://openflights.org/user/aseemsjohri]
[/url]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



_________________
11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Goat
Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 3260
Location: South of France

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 9:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some achievement this! First the fires in submarines and now a brand new, tried and tested aircraft going down. Something is seriously amiss with India's military.

RIP to the crew!

Going by this, the poor chaps had a pretty gruesome death. People who came to help did not have boats to cross the river and provide assistance. Only in India..... Rolling Eyes

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/With-no-boats-to-cross-MP-cops-were-mute-spectators-to-IAFs-burning-C-130J-Super-Hercules/articleshow/32857363.cms
_________________
I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sabya99
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 1399
Location: New Jersey/CCU

PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It was a low altitude air dropping exercise , perhaps as low as 250 ft. Some unmarked hill top got on the way and the aircraft crashed. But C130 must have terrain following radar. This should not happen. May God bless those brave souls!!
_________________
Sabya99
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Goat
Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 3260
Location: South of France

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
It was a low altitude air dropping exercise , perhaps as low as 250 ft. Some unmarked hill top got on the way and the aircraft crashed. But C130 must have terrain following radar. This should not happen. May God bless those brave souls!!


That is ridiculous, if true.

First, the aircraft was flying relatively close to the airbase, so this unmarked hill would have been well known to the airmen who fly regularly in the area. Even if it was unknown, the plane was flying in good weather during daytime, so a prominent feature like a small hill would have been quite clearly visible from miles away. And then there's the terrain following radar.

It looks like a case of pilot error to me.
_________________
I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ssbmat
Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 1710

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The way I see things happening, I think there is perhaps excessive coverage of "military" incidents in the general public domain. I mean, I am equally guilty commenting about all the stuff myself.

I think some things must be best left to the capability of the institutions. I am sure they will find out and fix the issues cuz they love their own lives just as much as everybody else.

Just about everything is being linked to corruption/scam/laxity etc. This discussion should not be triggered due to such incidents/accidents but should be an ongoing action.
The Air Force or the Navy are not civilian institutions that should be accountable to the public like an Indian Railways/Air India are, for example.
If anyone it is that minister and his cohorts who should be accountable.
Catch them by their pants/lungis but let the men in uniform do their job without disturbance.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
desiguy2447
Member


Joined: 23 Feb 2007
Posts: 37

PostPosted: Sat Mar 29, 2014 7:11 pm    Post subject: IAF Reply with quote

I agree with most lets just wait on the cause. I have gone to most Indian newspaper websites to see the comments and I am sick of all blame that IAF pilots are not trained, that the US hid something in the Cj130 and turn it on causing the crash, etc.. (Note all the stuff is nonsense at its best)

Whatever the cause of the crash is the IAF will find out and fix the issue so it does not happen again. On a good note I am glad we ordered another six of these planes though we lost one yesterday I am sure after elections it will be replaced with another maybe with some goodwill from Lockheed Martin or not.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stealthpilot
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2325
Location: BLR, DXB

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 2:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
It was a low altitude air dropping exercise , perhaps as low as 250 ft. Some unmarked hill top got on the way and the aircraft crashed. But C130 must have terrain following radar. This should not happen. May God bless those brave souls!!

If it was foggy and the radar blinked it still shouldn't have happened. If what you say is true, it doesn't matter if there were unmarked hills these pilots would have been trained to look out the window.

Too early to blame the pilots ..... we dont have any details yet.
_________________
eP007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://ibnlive.in.com/news/india-sends-blackbox-of-crashed-c130j-to-us-for-decoding-data/461285-3.html

India sends blackbox of crashed C-130J to US for decoding data

The black box of the C-130J transport aircraft that crashed near Gwalior on Friday has suffered damage and the Air Force has sent it to the US to seek the assistance of its manufacturer Lockheed Martin in decoding the data, IAF officials said on Sunday.

The connectors of the Flight Data Recorder or the black box are damaged along with the card inside the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR). "To avoid any loss of data while trying to decode the equipment, we have decided to send the black box to the US," an IAF spokesperson said. The black box was sent by an early morning flight on Sunday to Lockheed Martin, he said.

The delay in decoding the black box data would also mean a delay in determining the cause of the crash, he said. The IAF had stated on Friday that it would come out with a preliminary report on the reasons behind the mishap in 24 hours. The IAF spokesperson also denied reports suggesting that the C-130J fleet has been grounded after the crash, saying the aircraft did not fly on Saturday as the personnel of the squadron were busy in the last rites of the five victims of the crash.

The Super Hercules Special Operations transport aircraft crashed near Gwalior killing five crew members on Friday last after taking off from Agra. The aircraft had apparently hit a hillock before crashing on the rocky surface on the banks of Chambal river near Gwalior.

_________________
11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After reading the comments, all I can say is guys please give some time for the real cause to come out. It is very easy to say that pilots were not trained, adventurism etc. Please remember this was an extremely experienced crew and no one wants do die.

Let the court of inquiry come to its conclusions and we can then see what the real cause are. Remember brand new aircrafts has crashed before too. SRJ100 and Gol 738 comes into mind.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sumantra
Member


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 4685
Location: New Delhi

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At this moment, I will echo what Shukla-ji has just said, albeit in his characteristic mild manner. In this case, some of us have some more information from some of our IAF friends, which may become public very soon, once the official court of inquiry gives its results. Let us spare a moment to think about those brave airmen that performed the supreme sacrifice to avoid the huge plane going down over a populated area. These were extremely experienced airmen at the helm, and let us not deride the fallen, in any way. Airmen are acutely aware of the cost of a invaluable defence asset (the Super Herc, here) to the public exchequer as well. What we civilians to not realise, or often appreciate, is the extreme pains that armed force personnel take for us, who would not blink an eyelid about making the supreme sacrifice to save civilian lives. Let us at least, out of respect for the armed forces personnel on this forum, and those reading this, refrain from making adverse comments, when the truth is somewhat far from what has been doing the rounds, both on the grapevine, as well as some part of the speculation on the news channels.
Sincerely, Sumantra.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Goat
Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 3260
Location: South of France

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Did-IAFs-US-made-C-130J-Super-Hercules-that-crashed-have-fake-Chinese-parts/articleshow/32977838.cms

Did IAF’s 'US-made' C-130J Super Hercules that crashed have fake Chinese parts?

WASHINGTON: India's newly-acquired American C-130J Super Hercules plane that crashed last week near Gwalior has been under intense scrutiny in the United States and Canada after a Senate investigation concluded that counterfeit parts in the aircraft's display systems could cause it to "lose data or even go blank altogether" in midflight, with potentially catastrophic consequences.

A 2011-2012 investigation by the US Senate armed services committee eventually traced the counterfeit electronic parts used in the C-130J, C-27J, and many other US military systems to a company in Shenzhen, China, called Hong Dark Electronic Trade Company. Hong Dark sold the parts at issue to Global IC Trading Group, an independent distributor in the US, which in turn sold it to L-3 Communications Display Systems, which in turn supplied it to Lockheed Martin, the US military's prime contractor for the C-130J.


I wonder if the MH 777 also had counterfeit Chinese parts, which caused it to crash.
_________________
I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
fake Chinese parts?

... as opposed to real Chinese parts.
_________________
11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sabya99
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 1399
Location: New Jersey/CCU

PostPosted: Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sometimes I think was it necessary for IAF to buy such an expensive tubo plane as HERC!!. After all it comes with a price tag of 1000 crores/ plane. You might get a few IL-76/78 or may be ten AN-26 with that price tag.Its time to think hard!
_________________
Sabya99
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
Sometimes I think was it necessary for IAF to buy such an expensive tubo plane as HERC!!. After all it comes with a price tag of 1000 crores/ plane. You might get a few IL-76/78 or may be ten AN-26 with that price tag.Its time to think hard!


Its quality vs Quantity Sir. Would you go to the border with just a knife to face your enemy who is equipped with AK-47?

I assume your answer would be no.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sabya99
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 1399
Location: New Jersey/CCU

PostPosted: Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

shivendrashukla wrote:
sabya99 wrote:
Sometimes I think was it necessary for IAF to buy such an expensive tubo plane as HERC!!. After all it comes with a price tag of 1000 crores/ plane. You might get a few IL-76/78 or may be ten AN-26 with that price tag.Its time to think hard!


Its quality vs Quantity Sir. Would you go to the border with just a knife to face your enemy who is equipped with AK-47?

I assume your answer would be no.


Mr. Shukla, quantity itself has a quality in the battlefield! Very Happy I would like to know what special quality HERC has to be priced 1000 crores a piece? How different it is from well tested Il-76/AN-26 ? Why IAF so eager to sink so much money for a turboprop aircraft?
_________________
Sabya99
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 6:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bearing the tail number KC-3803, the aircraft was the third of six C-130Js that were delivered to the Indian air force between 2010 and 2012. Part of a two-aircraft training sortie, it had taken off from Agra and crashed near Gwalior air base, where the lead aircraft later landed safely.

The ill-fated transport was commanded by Wg Cdr Prashant Joshi, an experienced pilot who was deputy formation leader when three C-130Js took part in the type's inaugural flypast at India’s Republic Day parade in 2012.


http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/india-waits-on-c-130j-crash-findings-397750/
_________________
11000 posts (and counting) on Airliners-India.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Aseem
Member


Joined: 15 Dec 2006
Posts: 2841
Location: YYZ

PostPosted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 9:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
Mr. Shukla, quantity itself has a quality in the battlefield! Very Happy I would like to know what special quality HERC has to be priced 1000 crores a piece? How different it is from well tested Il-76/AN-26 ? Why IAF so eager to sink so much money for a turboprop aircraft?


My educated guess would be that Hercules is best suited for landing on places like Daulat Beig Oldie! Sometime reasons behind policy decisions are hard to fathom.

VT-ASJ
_________________
[url=http://openflights.org/user/aseemsjohri]
[/url]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
stealthpilot
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2325
Location: BLR, DXB

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
Mr. Shukla, quantity itself has a quality in the battlefield! Very Happy I would like to know what special quality HERC has to be priced 1000 crores a piece? How different it is from well tested Il-76/AN-26 ? Why IAF so eager to sink so much money for a turboprop aircraft?

Kinda unfair to call the C130 a turboprop
The IL76 is junk- well tested junk. The AN26 isn't even in the same league.
The 330 tanker costs more than the IL76 platform ..... for the same obvious reasons.
_________________
eP007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The_Goat
Member


Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 3260
Location: South of France

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aseem wrote:


My educated guess would be that Hercules is best suited for landing on places like Daulat Beig Oldie! Sometime reasons behind policy decisions are hard to fathom.

VT-ASJ


My educated guess is that the Americans/Lockheed Martin doled out better quality and heavier suitcases to our leech babus than the Russians did.

Let's cut the pretence. This is the only way defence deals happen in India.


Quote:
The IL76 is junk- well tested junk. The AN26 isn't even in the same league.


Maybe you have better knowledge about the operational aspects than I do, but I would beg to differ on one issue .

If I need to haul a 20 tonne payload out of a gravel strip in Africa in +50 degree heat , my choice will be the Ilyushin any day, particularly if I am not well disposed off economically.

And that's what makes Russian aircraft popular. They are designed keeping the toughest and most exacting operational environments in mind. And they are cheap and get the job done as well as anything, maybe even better than most things. There is a very good reason why those smoky Antonovs and Ilyushins still take to the skies in many parts of the World.

I agree that they may not be economical to operate compared to western makes, but they are perfectly suitable for military work where profit is not the primary goal. They may even make economic sense for military work in some cases, given their lower acquisition costs.

Coming back to India's requirements, I think that for most of our conditions, Russian aircraft may be more suitable. The only reason, apart from the suitcases, why our planners may have chosen the Herc could be the spare parts supply, which is not very reliable for Russian makes.
_________________
I don't know which is the more pampered bunch : AI's widebodies (the aunties) or Jet's widebodies (the planes).
-Jasepl
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:

Mr. Shukla, quantity itself has a quality in the battlefield! Very Happy I would like to know what special quality HERC has to be priced 1000 crores a piece? How different it is from well tested Il-76/AN-26 ? Why IAF so eager to sink so much money for a turboprop aircraft?


Sir,
Although I may not be qualified to answer this question with absolute certainity, I will try my best.

The C-130J were acquired for special ops by IAF. Presently this role is being served by nearly 30 year old Il-76, the last of which were delivered in 1989. The $1.1 Billion contract was for 6 C-130J along with spare parts and accessories which include :

- 6 Spare RR AE2100D3 Engines
- 8 Bae AN/ALR-56M advance radar warning receivers
- AN/ALE-47 CMDS
- 8 AAQ-22 Star SAFIRE III special operation suites
- 8 Rockwell Collins ARC 210 radio
- 8 ATK/AAR-47 Missile warning systems.

The point to note is that IL-76/AN-32 never had any of these systems or any analogous systems. With the advent of technology, going to a war without these systems would be suicidal.

Moreover C-130J has a strategic lifting capacity of 20Tonnes which fills the gap between IL-76 (43) and An-32 (6.7).

C-130J, is a modern platform which had its first flight in 1996 compared to 1960/1970 for AN-32 and IL-76. Spares are also a major issue of USSR first breaking up and now Ukraine under possible attack from Russia. Kiev is where ANTONOV is based. The IL-76 has a very poor availability percentage.

Also the IL-76 almost takes off empty from Leh due to engine performance issues. The same is not true for C-130J and C-17s that are being inducted now.

I hope this answers your question Dr Ganguly.

-Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sabya99
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 1399
Location: New Jersey/CCU

PostPosted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Il-76 is not a junk aircraft at all. American Air force generals have lot of respect for it. The entire Afgan war of Soviet Union was initiated and sustained by this aircraft . Not a single was lost neither by ground fire or Stinger missile attack and was suitable for operation from contested air space. Of course I am not familiar with spare parts issue or Ukraine independence issues. But I still could not apprehend the price tag of 1000 crores/ aircraft! Perhaps lots of kick back attached to it. Any way thanks forum for the input about HERC. Very Happy
_________________
Sabya99
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stealthpilot
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2325
Location: BLR, DXB

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 2:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Junk may have been a harsh word .... outdated perhaps?

The_Goat wrote:
My educated guess is that the Americans/Lockheed Martin doled out better quality and heavier suitcases to our leech babus than the Russians did.

Unfortunately I would agree, defence deals are heavily lobbied and greased. That being said I believe the C17/130 are a better product.

The_Goat wrote:
Maybe you have better knowledge about the operational aspects than I do, but I would beg to differ on one issue .

No operational knowledge, just my opinion. I agree there may be specific roles for the IL76 but our armed forces probably concluded that flying out of gravel strips in 50 degrees Africa was not a big requirement. I know you were not being literal and didn't mean to specify that example- but the point is the same, there may be missions out there where the Russian oldie is great but overall it probably gets beaten by newer western built models.

The_Goat wrote:
And they are cheap and get the job done as well as anything, maybe even better than most things. There is a very good reason why those smoky Antonovs and Ilyushins still take to the skies in many parts of the World.

Which countries still fly them? ex Soviet bloc + South American + developing countries mainly I guess? Probably the ones who cant afford to buy new aircrafts I would imagine? Let's not kid ourselves, A lot of these aircraft (even the C130) are old designs - just upgraded variants (which is not necessarily a bad thing). What it comes down to is performance and technology which the Ilyushins/Antonovs are lagging.

Like you said, cost isn't (or shouldn't) be the biggest factor for the armed forced. Having the best hardware, reliable and high performing equipment is. 30 years ago the Ilyushins/Antonovs probably fit that role but not any more.

sabya99 wrote:
Il-76 is not a junk aircraft at all. American Air force generals have lot of respect for it. The entire Afgan war of Soviet Union was initiated and sustained by this aircraft.

The Americans also feared the Mig21 ...... that was then. Since India has IL76 it may make sense to retrofit them and keep them another decade but beyond that is stupidity. Buying a brand new one today???? Not the same thing Confused
The IL76 are old .... unless you want to send one to Kiev for a retrofit even then it is still technologically old.

Why would anyone, in this day and age buy an IL76? It's $$$- cost is the only answer.
_________________
eP007
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sabya99
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 1399
Location: New Jersey/CCU

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 8:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If desi economy could fit the bill of paying 1000 crores/ bird then it is fine with me. But no one cares for that any more.
_________________
Sabya99
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2014 11:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sabya99 wrote:
If desi economy could fit the bill of paying 1000 crores/ bird then it is fine with me. But no one cares for that any more.


Military hardware is inherently expensive Sir. A Su-30MKI costs around 230Cr and even our very own desi Tejas costs 190Cr. I guess it is the price of freedom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
747-237
Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 11347
Location: Gordon Gekko's Boardroom

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 9:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/error-in-piloting-led-to-c-130j-hercules-aircraft-crash-indian-air-force-sources-549988

Error in Piloting Led to C-130J Hercules Aircraft Crash: Indian Air Force Sources

June 29, 2014

Error in piloting is understood to have been found as the reason behind the crash of Air Force's C-130J Super Hercules aircraft in March in which five service personnel, including four officers, were killed near Gwalior.

The Court of Inquiry is almost complete and error in piloting is believed to have been the reason behind the crash, highly placed IAF sources said in New Delhi.

The aircraft, worth over Rs. 900 crore, had crashed while practicing a tactical operation along with another C-130J Super Hercules aircraft after taking off from Agra on March 28.

All the crew on board - four officers and one Warrant Officer - lost their lives in the mishap.

The IAF Court of Inquiry under an officer of the rank of Air Commodore (equivalent to a Brigadier in Army) is in the final stages and the report will be soon submitted to the Defence Ministry, IAF spokesperson Group Captain Gerard Galway said.

India recently inducted six C-130J Super Hercules aircraft which were bought from the US at a cost of around Rs. 6,000 crore (USD 1 billion) four years ago.

The inquiry was held back for some time in the early stages as the black box of the aircraft had suffered damage and had to be sent to the original equipment manufacturer Lockheed Martin Corporation's facility in the US.

The home base of the 77 squadron 'Veiled Vipers' operating the ill-fated aircraft is Hindan in Ghaziabad.

The aircraft had recently landed at Ladakh's Daulat Beg Oldie air field near the Sino-India border and have helped in boosting IAF's capability to airlift troops closer to the border in times of emergency.

IAF has also placed orders for another six such aircraft, which are planned to be deployed in Panagarh, West Bengal, near the headquarters of Indian Army's 17 Strike Corp being raised to counter the threat along the border with China.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nimish
Member


Joined: 16 Dec 2006
Posts: 9757
Location: Bangalore, India

PostPosted: Mon Jun 30, 2014 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^^ How tragic, especially as it will weigh down on the family of the pilot(s).

I hope this leads to some changes/ improvements in the training and procedures.
_________________
We miss you Nalini!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
megatop747
Member


Joined: 10 Oct 2007
Posts: 131
Location: now LHR / from MAA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 25, 2014 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Has our media shown this version of what happened??

Quote:
An Indian Air Force Lockheed C-130J Hercules has crashed 72 miles from Gwalior in Madhya Pradesh. All five crew members died in the accident.
The transport plane was part of a two-ship formation on a training mission out of Agra where it departed at 10:00 local time. Both aircraft descended to 300 feet altitude for a simulated drop. Preliminary findings suggest that KC-3803 hit the wake turbulence of the lead aircraft that was climbing to 1000 feet following the simulated drop.
The airplane probably stalled after it hit the wake turbulence with the crew unable to recover at low altitude.


Source : http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=20140328-0
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ssbmat
Member


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 1710

PostPosted: Sun Jul 27, 2014 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am sorry if this appears to be a dumb question, especially to those who are associated in some way with the Indian armed forces.
When most of the equipment was Soviet, including the Transport/airlift arm, the IAF pilots would have been conversant primarily with metric system ie- height in metres , which is the Soviet norm. With the reorientation to Western equipment which probably always measures height in feet, would it be a bit of a challenge to quickly interpret the data on your flight displays especially during certain "advanced" manuevers, so would 100 be interpreted as 100m~300 feet (mentally) when in fact it was indicated 100 feet ?
I mean, a lot of these things have happened in the commercial world atleast..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Mon Jul 28, 2014 6:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ssbmat wrote:
I am sorry if this appears to be a dumb question, especially to those who are associated in some way with the Indian armed forces.
When most of the equipment was Soviet, including the Transport/airlift arm, the IAF pilots would have been conversant primarily with metric system ie- height in metres , which is the Soviet norm. With the reorientation to Western equipment which probably always measures height in feet, would it be a bit of a challenge to quickly interpret the data on your flight displays especially during certain "advanced" manuevers, so would 100 be interpreted as 100m~300 feet (mentally) when in fact it was indicated 100 feet ?
I mean, a lot of these things have happened in the commercial world atleast..


Hi. Its not a dumb question Smile. Let me try and answer if I can. IAF purchased and heavily modified its acquisitions. Almost all of its transport fleets had been modified in the avionics front. This included systems which measured height in feet as opposed to the conventional system of Meters. The two factors here were :

1. IAF always had a mixed western and Russian fleet
2. Its standardisation with civilian part meant that it had to choose the more widespread system, which was Feet.

I hope this answers your query.

Cheers
Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sumantra
Member


Joined: 28 Oct 2007
Posts: 4685
Location: New Delhi

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 3:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am not sure if the the time is right for me to make this comment, and Shukla-ji may castigate me for this, this is what I got from a retired IAF officer who had attended Wing Cdr Joshi's funeral (who was to have taken over the Super Herc team under his able leadership, ironically). Let us spare a thought for the top-notch crew on baord the ill-fated plane. The two Super Hercs were on a Nap-of-the-Earth (NoE) mission, which entails flying extremely low over the terrain. The second Herc unfortunately got caught up in the downwash of the first one, and one has to feel for Wing Cdr Joshi and the four other officers: in their last few moments, they managed to steer the aircraft away from a populated region.

Dr. Ganguly: why the Super Herc? For a layman, just two reasons, among many others.
1. The Uttarakhand disaster. No other plane could have managed such a lot, on such short and un-prepared airstrips.
2. Daulat Beg Oldie (DBO). Again, the Super Herc, and the Super Herc, alone.

A few more points:
- A turboprop is not old technology. It is a turbine-powered aircraft, and perhaps the most fuel efficient. In many applications, one simply does not need the speed. And come on, turboprops can be very fast, as well. What about the NK-12 contra-props on the Tu-95/142 `Bear'? You cannot call that plane slow, by any means.
- The C-130J is not the same C-130 of the olden times. It is almost a completely new aircraft, with superficial similarities with the old one.
- The IAF's transport group has different planes for different tasks, different capabilities, and different reasons. One cannot compare planes on the basis of the price tags alone.
- An-26? Now, that is an ancient plane. An An-32 suits the IAF perfectly in terms of the hot and high capability. The refurbishment programme bears testimony to that.
- The Il-76 `Gajraj' has had its share of issues (engines, among them), but for some applications, it is still one of the best around.
Sincerely, Sumantra.


Last edited by sumantra on Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:12 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
shivendrashukla
Member


Joined: 21 Dec 2006
Posts: 1354
Location: Mumbai, India

PostPosted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 5:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sumantra Sir, I can never even dream to castigate you Wink. You with your in dept knowledge and analysis have put in very good points. I agree with you completely Sir.

Cheers
Shivendra
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Airliners-India.com Forum Index -> Military Aviation & Space All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com