Airliners-India Forum Index Airliners-India
Flickr Group
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Air India's Employees to Aircraft Ratio

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Airliners-India Forum Index -> Civil Aviation
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Manish Soni
Member


Joined: 09 Sep 2009
Posts: 51
Location: Mumbai

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:03 am    Post subject: Air India's Employees to Aircraft Ratio Reply with quote

This is something which has always perplexed me over the years,
The Hindu Suggests its - 330 to 1 while Reuters Puts its at - 230 to 1

Can someone please quote what the actual numbers are & also the stats for other Indian Carriers ?

I'm guessing at the very maximum about half of what AI's figures are.
Also, besides the fact that its a govt co, (pardon me for being stupid but.......) what on earth is the big idea of investing in such a large staff ?

I know axing someone's job is a terrible thing to do & it may be an absolute calamity on the aggrieved person (especially after a certain age wherein he/she may find it very difficult to find alternate employment besides the obvious riots expected by the unions & political parties) but, cant they just be shifted to other new/upcoming governmental projects which require manpower rather than burden AI ?

Your thoughts & inputs please..........
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 5820
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The ideal ratio should be anywhere between 1:130-170.
regds
MEL.
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
con spirito
Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2007
Posts: 287
Location: Inflight

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I dont know why it is this way, but the ugly truth is that in most of the departments of AI, there are two people doing one man job. What would the company gain if it has so many powerless DGM's running around? In short Air India is Overpaid and Overstaffed.
_________________
Learning never stops, the desire to learn however does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Spiderguy252
Member


Joined: 10 Aug 2007
Posts: 1087
Location: Chennai/Bangalore

PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

con spirito wrote:
I dont know why it is this way, but the ugly truth is that in most of the departments of AI, there are two people doing one man job. What would the company gain if it has so many powerless DGM's running around? In short Air India is Overpaid and Overstaffed.


That's a well known fact. But since they are owned by the GoI, those 'extra' employees cannot be fired.
_________________
Windows 7. Get it now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
iah87
Member


Joined: 17 Apr 2007
Posts: 547

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Overstaffed and cannot be fired - This is one of the main reasons, Tata and SQ walked out of the deals to takeover AI. And no one will touch them in the future unless staffing issue can be solved.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mintra
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spiderguy252 wrote:
con spirito wrote:
I dont know why it is this way, but the ugly truth is that in most of the departments of AI, there are two people doing one man job. What would the company gain if it has so many powerless DGM's running around? In short Air India is Overpaid and Overstaffed.


That's a well known fact. But since they are owned by the GoI, those 'extra' employees cannot be fired.


Then why were they hired in the first place? Confused

It is not as if the scale of AI's operations has changed drastically in the past few years. Why hire so many in the first place when you know you can't fire them later?
Back to top
con spirito
Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2007
Posts: 287
Location: Inflight

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mintra wrote:


Then why were they hired in the first place? Confused

It is not as if the scale of AI's operations has changed drastically in the past few years. Why hire so many in the first place when you know you can't fire them later?

Thats where lack of planning comes into picture. There are so many instances of lack of planning in AI, one being when Boeing had just delivered the 777's and AI had no pilots to fy them.
_________________
Learning never stops, the desire to learn however does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
me111993
Member


Joined: 04 Sep 2009
Posts: 171

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 1:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have a strange thought here. Can't the ground staff members, pilots and maintinence engineers be outsourced?? If there is a single compamy who hires these people and airlines then inturn contract these people for a specific period of time, almost literally leasing them. The airline would then have all correspondence with this single company only.
This would solve a lot of employment related problems faced by airlines today.
Me111993
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
con spirito
Member


Joined: 07 Apr 2007
Posts: 287
Location: Inflight

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 3:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ground staff are outsourced by AI to Livewel Aviation out here at BOM.
_________________
Learning never stops, the desire to learn however does.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Manish Soni
Member


Joined: 09 Sep 2009
Posts: 51
Location: Mumbai

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HAWK21M wrote:
The ideal ratio should be anywhere between 1:130-170.
regds
MEL.

And that should go down slightly as you add to the fleet right ?

iah87 wrote:
Overstaffed and cannot be fired - This is one of the main reasons, Tata and SQ walked out of the deals to takeover AI. And no one will touch them in the future unless staffing issue can be solved.

Bingo Exclamation

Question : If AI ever decides to offload equity, why on earth would anyone want to buy into it if the GOI is going to be a majority stakeholder ?
I'm not sure if this has been submitted in the recent proposals to bring back AI to profitability etc to the govt but do they really expect people to buy their shares ?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HAWK21M
Member


Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 5820
Location: Mumbai, INDIA

PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 12:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Major hurdle is Demotivated Employees.....
The 68 aircraft will drop the ratio but still not enough to turn profits unless people decide to work,which majority don't.

Privatize is one way.
regds
MEL.
_________________
Think of the Brighter side !!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Airliners-India Forum Index -> Civil Aviation All times are GMT + 5.5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group. Hosted by phpBB.BizHat.com